Calc Problem: Find Length & Width of Cheerios Box

  • Thread starter Thread starter Patsmatrix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves finding the length and width of a Cheerios box with a known volume of 182.743 cubic inches, a depth of 2.31245 inches, and a width that is 3.1875 inches less than the length. To solve it, one must set up the volume equation for a rectangular solid, which is length times width times depth. By expressing the width in terms of the length, a quadratic equation can be derived. The discussion highlights confusion over the classification of the problem as a calculus issue, emphasizing that it primarily involves basic geometry and algebra. Ultimately, the focus is on correctly applying the volume formula to find the dimensions of the box.
Patsmatrix
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
The volume of a 10-ounce box of Cheerios is 182.743 cubic inches. The width of the box is 3.1875 inches less then the length, and its depth is 2.31245 inches. Find the length and width of teh box to the thouandanths.

A: I've looked at this problem for a couple of hours, and hunted through my textbook for an equal amount of time, searching for the right formula and how to do it. However, I have been unable to solve this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you set up an equation for the volume of the box?
 
If you set the equation up correctly using all the known info (what's the formula for finding the volume of a box), you should wind up with a quadratic equation.
 
You should know that the Volume of a rectangular solid is "length times width times depth". Call the length "l" and then use a "The width of the box is 3.1875 inches less then the length" to write the width as expression in l. You are told that the volume is 182.743 and the depth is 2.31245 so you have one equation in the one unknown l.

This is basic geometry and algebra. Why in the world is it called a "Calculus" problem?
 
It's probably preparation for extrema problems.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top