Calculate Acceleration & Velocity of Motion Under Gravity

  • Thread starter Thread starter math4me
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Motion
AI Thread Summary
To calculate acceleration and velocity from the provided data, the equations of motion under gravity can be applied. The distance and time data allows for the calculation of velocity between intervals, revealing that velocity changes over time, indicating acceleration. For example, using the first two data points, the initial velocity can be calculated as 5.6 m/s, and subsequent calculations show an acceleration of -17 m/s². The discussion emphasizes the need for multiple time intervals to accurately derive acceleration and velocity from discrete data points. Understanding these calculations is essential for analyzing motion under gravity effectively.
math4me
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I would really appreciate some help on this please:

Distance in metres
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1

Time talen to travel distance (in seconds)

0.72
1.28
1.67
1.85
2.08
2.50
2.83
3.01
3.13
3.25

What would you expect the accelartion to be and also what would you expect the velocity to be?

Mass = 0.164 Kg

Inital velocity = 0.

The experiment was letting a cylinder roll down the ramp and the data is above.

I just can't seem to calculate the acceleration and velocity could someone please help me thank you very much (much appreciated).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know that:
x(t) = x_0 + v_0t + \frac{1}{2}at^2
You have three variables, x0, v0 and a. You already know that x0 and v0 are zero, so that leaves you with:
x(t) = \frac{1}{2}at^2
To find the acceleration just use one of the measurements, for example 1m and 3.25s:
1m = \frac{1}{2}a(3.25s)^2
As for calculating the velocity, that is just:
v(t) = v_0 + at
The value of t varies depending on when you want to find the velocity.
 
At the last point the final velocity, so what would the acceleration be, not to clude up on the equation(s).

Thank you very much
 
Anybody please tyty.
 
I don't understand your questions.
 
In a discrete set of data, acceleration will require two time intervals, since it is a second order derivative.

(note: position is zeroth order, and does not require an interval, just a point; velocity is first order, and therefore requires one time interval, that is, two points; every order of time derivative, requires that many time intervals to specify)

You have 9 time intervals, so, you have 8 meaningful accelerations. I'll give you an example:

(t,x)0 = (0.1,0.72)
(t,x)1 = (0.2,1.28)
(t,x)2 = (0.3,1.67)

This gives you three positions (three null intervals), two velocities (2 x 1 interval), and one acceleration (1 x 2 intervals). The velocity is the space interval divided by the time interval from one point to the next:

v0 = (x1 - x0)/(t1 - t0) = (1.28 - 0.72)/(0.2 - 0.1) = 5.6
v1 = (x2 - x1)/(t2 - t1) = (1.67 - 1.28)/(0.3 - 0.1) = 3.9

Notice that the velocity is changing, thus, there is an acceleration.

a0 = (v1 - v0)/(t1 - t0) = (3.9 - 5.6)/(0.2 - 0.1) = -17

There are also other ways to do it.


Notice the similarity in:

x'(t) = lim(as dt -> 0){x(t+dt)-x(t)}/{(t+dt)-t}

The discrete treatment given above is a consequence of not taking the limit.
 
Last edited:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top