Calculate an error bound of this interpolation value

JimmyJockstrap
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I attached the file. I am up to 1(c).

Would the error bound of the interpolation value just be taylor series error term?

Thanks
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, that's just the Taylor Series error form:
error< \frac{M_n}{n!}|x^n|
Where Mn is an upperbound on the nth derivative between 0 and x.
 
so the 3rd derivative of ln(1+x)= 2/((1+x)^3)

And the upper bound on that between 0 and x=1, since I was solving ln(1+1), is 2?



so Mn=

so error<(2/(3!))*1^3=0.333333333333333333?

I was wondering is the error bound meant to be 0.333333333 each side or 0.3333333 overall so is it 0.1666666666666666666666 each side(ie. positive and negative) or 0.3333333333 a side so 0.66666666666666666666666 overall both sides?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top