Calculate Assessable Income with a 50% Franked Dividend of $500

  • Thread starter Thread starter JimmyJockstrap
  • Start date Start date
JimmyJockstrap
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
you receive a 50% franked dividend of $500. corporate tax rate is 30%.

what is your assessable income in relation to this?

from my understanding.

it would be 500/.85 or something like that.

u pretend u receive an unfranked dividend and just go off ur personal tax rate.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
"Investopedia" said:
"An arrangement in Australia that eliminates the double taxation of dividends. Dividends are dispersed with tax imputations attached to them. The shareholder is able to reduce the tax paid on the dividend by an amount equal to the tax imputation credits. Basically, taxation of dividends has been partially paid by the company issuing the dividend.

This concept is best illustrated by an example. Suppose you receive a franked dividend of $100. Assume the before-tax value of this dividend is $125 (this will depend on the company's rate of taxation). In other words, the company has to generate $125 of pre-tax profit to be able to disperse the dividend.

If your marginal tax rate is 30%, you will owe $12.50 in taxes on the franked dividend (($100) -($125 * (1-.3))= $12.5). If the dividend is unfranked, you will owe $30 on the $100 dividend ($100 * (1-.7)= $30. Essentially, the company pays a portion of the tax that you would owe if the dividend was unfranked. In Australia, these taxes are paid to the Australian Tax Office (ATO).
for those of us who are not Aussies!

Call the "original amount" X. If the corporate tax rate is 30$, the corporation has already paid 0.3X leaving X- 0.3X= 0.7X to give to you: 0.7X= 500 so X= 500/.7= $714.28. Would be the "unfranked" amount. Unfortunately, I am still not clear on what the "50%" in a "50% franked dividend of $500" means.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
142
Views
34K
Replies
49
Views
11K
Replies
69
Views
10K
Back
Top