Calculate Capacitance with Dielectrics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the capacitance of a parallel-plate capacitor with a dielectric slab inserted between its plates. The slab's position does not affect the overall capacitance, which can be modeled as a series of three capacitors, each with different dielectric constants. The potential difference remains consistent regardless of the slab's placement, as the charge on the capacitor stays the same while the electric field changes within the dielectric. The explanation includes the concept of using metal foils as new plates to simplify the analysis. Ultimately, the capacitance remains constant irrespective of the slab's location within the capacitor.
screen1998
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I need help with this.
A non-conducting slab of thickness t, area A and dielectric constant κe is inserted into the space between the plates of a parallel-plate capacitor with spacing d, charge Q and area A, as shown in Figure 7.7.5(a). The slab is not necessarily halfway between the capacitor plates. What is the capacitance of the system?
attachment.php?attachmentid=58329&d=1367243066.jpg

What I don't understand here is the transform from Figurre 7.7.5 to Figure 7.7.6.
How we know that Figure 7.7.6 is the equivalent configuration of Figure 7.7.5?
And why the two dielectrics don't create electric plates because they have different dielectric constants? I know dielectric polarisation but in this case there are two dielectrics with different dielectric constants, therefore I wonder if these electric dipoles will cancel out in the region between two plates of the capacitor.
 

Attachments

  • Capacitor.JPG
    Capacitor.JPG
    31.2 KB · Views: 2,934
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Any help?:smile:
 
Put the slab anywhere - the resultant capacitor is series resultant of three capacitors. Does the result depend to where the slab was placed ?

ehild
 
ehild said:
Put the slab anywhere - the resultant capacitor is series resultant of three capacitors. Does the result depend to where the slab was placed ?

ehild
Hi ehild,
Could you explain why there are two capacitors in series? What are the sencond plate of these capacitors?
 
The potential is the same along a plane parallel with the capacitor plates. You can substitute an equipotential surface by a thin metal foil- nothing changes.
Putting a dielectric slab of thickness t inside the capacitor at distance d1 from the top plate, and imagining thin metal foils on the top and base faces of the dielectric slab,it is equivalent with three capacitors in series: all with area A, thickness and relative dielectric constant d1,1 ; t, ε, (d-d1-t), 1. The metal foils serve as new plates, see figure. Write up the resultant: you will see that d1 cancels. The resultant capacitance is the same for all d1, it can be even zero, which corresponds to the situation that the dielectric slab touches one plate.

A more basic approach is through the definition of capacitance: It is charge over voltage. Inserting the dielectric slab does not change the charge on the capacitor, but changes the electric field inside the dielectric slab. If it was E without the dielectrics, inside the dielectrics it will be E/εr. You get the potential difference between the plates by integrating the electric field along the gap between the plates: it is Ed1+t E/εr+E(d-t-d1)=E(d-t)+tE/εr. The voltage does not depend on the position of the slab, so you can shift it to one plate and then you get two capacitors in series.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • dielslab.JPG
    dielslab.JPG
    5.9 KB · Views: 777
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top