Calculate Cell Potential at 25°C for Fe & Pd Cells

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the cell potential for the given electrochemical cell, the standard potentials for Fe^2+/Fe (-0.45 V) and Pd^2+/Pd (+0.95 V) were used. The cathode was identified as Pd due to its higher standard potential. Initial calculations yielded an E Cell potential of 1.40 V, which did not match any provided answer choices. The discrepancy arose because the Nernst equation must be applied to account for non-standard conditions, specifically the concentrations of Fe^2+ and Pd^2+. The correct cell potential, after applying the Nernst equation, is +1.28 V, which corresponds to option A.
τheory
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the cell potential at 25°C for the cell:

Fe (s) | (Fe^2+ (0.100 M) || Pd^2+ (1.0*10^-5 M) | Pd (s)

given that the standard potential for Fe^2+/Fe is -0.45 V and for Pd^2+/Pd is +0.95 V.

A. +1.28 V
B. +1.16 V
C. +1.52 V
D. +1.68 V

Homework Equations


E Cell potential = E Cathode - E Anode

The Attempt at a Solution


By looking at the two potentials for Fe and Pd, I deducted that the species at the cathode was Pd because 0.95 > -0.45. Then, I took the difference:

E Cell potential = E Cathode - E Anode
E Cell Potential = 0.95 - (-0.45)
E Cell potential = 1.40 V (which isn't even an answer choice)

However upon looking at answer choices and the answer key, the answer was in fact A. +1.28 V; can someone explain to me what went wrong in my calculations? Or if there is a typo?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solutions are not in a standard state - you have to correct for concentrations using Nernst equation.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top