Calculate Gross Tax only knowing Net Earnings

  • Thread starter Thread starter bradles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Net Taxes
bradles
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I was wondering if it is possible to work out a formula for calculating what your gross earnings would have to be to earn a certain net value.

The tax on earnings scales go like this:

Between $0 - $6000 you pay no tax.
Between $6001 - $25000 you pay 15c per dollar.
Between $25001 - $75000 you pay 30c per dollar.
Between $75001 - $150000 you pay 40c per dollar.
Greater than $150000 you pay 45c per dollar.

So Gross - Tax = Net. Based on the above I'd like to be able to solve what your gross would be if you knew your net earnings.

Does anyone know how to write the formula for this? I'm having trouble just writing a formula to explain the above solving for gross.

Brad.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Just as your tax table is a "step function", so the formula giving gross income as a function of net income will be a step function:
Let N= net income, G= gross income in dollars.

If 0<= N<= 6000, then G= N
If 6001<= N<= 29412, Then N= G- .15G= 0.85G so G= N/.85.
(the upper limit, $29412, is 25000/.85)
If 29412<= N<= 107143, Then N= G- .30G= 0.70G so G= N/.70.
(Again, the upper limit, $107143, is 75000/.70)

etc.

By the way, a more realistic tax schedule would be

Between $0- $6000 you pay no tax.
Between $6001- $25000 you pay 15c per dollar over $6000
Between $25001- $75000 you pay 3750 (.15*$25000) plus 30c per dollar 1over $25000
Between $75001- $150000 you pay $18750 (3750+ .30(50000)) plus 40c per dollar over $75000
Over $150001, you pay $48750 ($18750+ .40(75000)) plus 45c per dollar over $150001.
 
If you'd like a formula in Microsoft Excel to this for you...

=IF(A1<=6000,0,IF(A1<=25000,(A1-6000)*0.15,IF(A1<=75000,3750+(A1-25000)*0.3,IF(A1<=150000,18750+(A1-75000)*0.4,48750+(A1-150000)*0.45))))

where A1 is the cell which contains the Net salarý.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
9K
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
38
Views
25K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top