Calculate Heating Time of Object with Radiation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the heating time of an inner cylinder heated by radiation from an outer cylinder. Participants explore the theoretical framework, mathematical modeling, and potential numerical methods for solving the problem, which involves concepts from thermodynamics and heat transfer.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the equation for energy transfer using the Stefan-Boltzmann law and expresses the need to calculate the time required for the inner cylinder to reach a specific temperature.
  • Another participant reformulates the problem as a differential equation, suggesting that it can be solved with respect to time and temperature.
  • Some participants propose using numerical methods to solve the differential equation due to its non-linear nature, while others express uncertainty about the original poster's familiarity with such methods.
  • A participant recalls that the problem resembles Newton's Law of Cooling and discusses potential approximations for analytic estimates based on temperature differences.
  • Another participant mentions that an exact analytic solution can be derived using partial fractions but admits to a lack of motivation to do so.
  • A later reply introduces an external resource and questions the assumptions made in that approach, particularly regarding the type of gas and temperature conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various methods and approaches to solve the heating time problem, but there is no consensus on a single method or solution. Some participants advocate for numerical methods, while others suggest analytic approximations, indicating a range of opinions on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the differential equation is non-linear, and assumptions about temperature differences may affect the validity of certain approximations. There are also references to specific conditions under which different methods may be more appropriate.

tjosan
Messages
32
Reaction score
2
Hello.

I want to calculate how long time it takes to heat an object with radiation. The object is the inner cylinder of two concentric cylinders. The inner cylinder is not hollow. If assuming black body:

\dot{Q}_E=\sigma A_1(T_1^4-T(t)^4) [1]

Energy emitted must the same as the energy absorbed for the inner cylinder. I want the inner cylinder to reach temperature T_2 (T_2<T_1).
So the total energy needed for for inner cylinder is given by:

q=C_p(T_2-T(t))m [2]

However, as can be seen, as the temperature of the inner cylinder increase, \dot{Q_E} ([2]) will decrease.

So how do I calculate how long time it will take for it to reach T_2?

Assumptions:
Black body
Inner cylinder has uniform temperature, i.e. surface temperature = core temperature at all times.
 
Science news on Phys.org
$$mC_p\frac{dT}{dt}=\sigma A_1(T_1^4-T^4)$$
subject to some initial condition on T
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
To actually solve for the answer though, I'd use a numerical method in a spreadsheet to avoid dealing with the differential equation directly.
 
russ_watters said:
To actually solve for the answer though, I'd use a numerical method in a spreadsheet to avoid dealing with the differential equation directly.
I think what you're saying is that, because the equation is non-linear in T, one needs to integrate the differential equation numerically. Am I interpreting what you're saying correctly?
 
I'm not sure if one "needs to", I'm just saying I would: the equation looks fine, I'm just not sure if the OP is going to know what to do with it. I vaguely recall solving such equations for T or t back in college (this is a modified version of Newton's Law of Cooling, which was a specific example used), but would avoid it today.
 
Last edited:
russ_watters said:
I'm not sure if one "needs to", I'm just saying I would: the equation looks fine, I'm just not sure if the OP is going to know what to do with it. I vaguely recall solving such equations for T or t back in college (this is a modified version of Newton's Law of Cooling, which was a specific example used), but would avoid it today.
During my career, this kind of thing was my "bread and butter."

There are some good approximations that can be made to obtain an analytic estimate, depending on the initial temperature T0 and the final temperature T2. If (T2-T0) is small compared to both (T2+T0)/2 and to T1-T2, then the right hand side of the equation can be evaluated at Tave = (T2+T0)/2. The heating time then becomes:
$$t=\frac{\sigma A_1(T_1^4-T_{ave}^4)}{mC_p(T_2-T_0)}$$
A better approximation is obtained by first factoring the right hand side of the differential equation:
$$mC_p\frac{dT}{dt}=\sigma A_1(T_1^2+T^2)(T_1+T)(T_1-T)$$
If we then substitute Tave for T in the first two parentheses, we obtain:
$$mC_p\frac{dT}{dt}=h_{ave} A_1(T_1-T)\tag{1}$$
where have is the average heat transfer coefficient, given by:
$$h_{ave}=\sigma (T_1^2+T_{ave}^2)(T_1+T_{ave})$$
Eqn. 1 is the standard Newton's cooling linear heat transfer equation that is readily solved analytically:
$$\frac{T_1-T_2}{T_1-T_0}=e^{-\frac{h_{ave}A_1}{mC_p}t}$$

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
The exact analytic solution to this problem can also be obtained by grouping the temperature terms on one side of the equation and using partial fractions. I'm just too lazy to do it.

Chet
 
Thank you for the answers!
Chestermiller said:
The exact analytic solution to this problem can also be obtained by grouping the temperature terms on one side of the equation and using partial fractions. I'm just too lazy to do it.
Chet

I have another question! I also found that you can use this aproach: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/cootime.html
When and Why would you do it this way?
 
tjosan said:
Thank you for the answers!
I have another question! I also found that you can use this aproach: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/cootime.html
When and Why would you do it this way?
That link inherently assumes that it is a monoatomic gas that is cooling (because of the expression used for the heat capacity), and it assumes that the temperature of the body it is radiating to is at 0 K (absolute zero).

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
9K