Chemistry Calculate Molecular Weight of Polyethylene from Osmotic Pressure

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the molecular weight of polyethylene from osmotic pressure, the relationship between osmotic pressure, concentration, and molecular weight must be applied. The osmotic pressure of the solution is given as 1.86 torr, with a polyethylene sample mass of 2.06 g in a 100 mL solution. The formula for osmotic pressure (π = cRT) can be used, where c is the concentration in mol/L, R is the ideal gas constant, and T is the temperature in Kelvin. By rearranging the equation to solve for molecular weight, the necessary calculations can be performed. Understanding these relationships is crucial for determining the molecular weight accurately.
mate1000
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
WOuld someone be able to give us a hand for this question, I am stumped.
Polyethylene is a synthetic polymer or plastic with many uses. 2.06 g of a polyethylene sample was dissolved in enough benzene to make 100 mL of solution, and the osmotic pressure was found to be 1.86 torr at 25oC. What is the molecular weight (g mol-1) of the polyethylene? (1 torr = 1 mm Hg, 1 atm = 760 mm Hg)
Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How does osmotic pressure depend on the dissolved substances concentrations?
 
You have to make an attempt at the question - what relationships do you know about osmotic pressure and molecular weight?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top