Calculate Net Electric Field at Point P | Two Charges 42cm Apart

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the net electric field at a point P located between two charges, one positive and one negative, which are separated by a distance of 42 cm. The positive charge is 3.2 x 10^-9 C and the negative charge is -6.4 x 10^-9 C. The point P is positioned 15 cm from the positive charge and 27 cm from the negative charge.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the electric field formula e = kq/r^2 and question the reasoning behind the calculations. There is an emphasis on considering the contributions from both charges and the vector nature of electric fields.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the importance of accounting for both charges when calculating the net electric field and have prompted others to clarify their steps in the calculations. There is an ongoing exploration of the directions of the electric fields produced by each charge.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential confusion regarding the distances used in calculations and the necessity of considering the vector nature of electric fields, which may not have been fully addressed by all participants.

Himanshu Singh
Messages
30
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Two charges, one of 3.2 x 10 ^ -9 C, the other one of -6.4x10^-9 C are 42 cm apart. Calculate the net electric field at point P, 15 cm from the postie charge, on the line connecting the charges

(+) -------------(Point)---------------------- (-)
15cm 27cm

Homework Equations


e = kq1/r1^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I know the correct answer, and the steps involved as well (answer is 1.3 x 10^3 N/C to the right) but I don't get why they do it the way they do it. Can't you just use e = kq1/r1^2 with q being 3.2 x 10 ^ -9 C and d being 0.42m and then subtract that from kq1/r1^2 with q being 3.2 x 10 ^ -9 C and d being 0.27m? I always get the wrong answer with it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write out the steps for the two paths in detail and see where you go astray. Post both if you still don't see it.
 
BvU said:
Write out the steps for the two paths in detail and see where you go astray. Post both if you still don't see it.
Also draw the arrows in the diagram showing the fields that you want to calculate.
 
Himanshu Singh said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I know the correct answer, and the steps involved as well (answer is 1.3 x 10^3 N/C to the right) but I don't get why they do it the way they do it. Can't you just use e = kq1/r1^2 with q being 3.2 x 10 ^ -9 C and d being 0.42m and then subtract that from kq1/r1^2 with q being 3.2 x 10 ^ -9 C and d being 0.27m? I always get the wrong answer with it.

Well, the problem is that, the Electric field is a vector and therefore, the net electric field at a point will be the resultant of the electric fields "caused" by both the charges q1 and q2. You are ignoring the other charged particle (q2 = -6.4x10^-9C). As a result you miss out on the contribution due to q2 and get the wrong answer. Account for the both charges and let me know if you get the answer. Do reply if you didn't get this.
 
Himanshu Singh said:
and then subtract that from kq1/r1^2 with q being 3.2 x 10 ^ -9 C and d being 0.27m?

Since you used the distance from the negative charge, I assume you are referring here to the negative charge and you just typed in the wrong number.

But I think what you're missing is fact that electric field is a vector and you have to take into account the direction of the field.

What direction is the field from a positive charge? What direction is it pointing at point P, right or left?
What direction is the field from a negative charge? What direction is it pointing at point P, right or left?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K