Calculate persistence length from force extension data of a single DNA

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the persistence length (P) of a single dsDNA molecule from force-extension data. The user plotted 1/sqrt(F) against extension (x) and fitted a linear model, using an interpolation formula from Bustamante et al. (1994) to relate force and extension. The calculated persistence length values, around 2.7 nm, are significantly lower than the expected 50 nm for dsDNA. The user seeks feedback on potential errors in their approach, particularly regarding the choice of force range and linearity assumptions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate data interpretation in biophysical measurements.
pen
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello!

From a data set of F-x measurements of a single dsDNA molecule I want to calculate the persistence length P. So I plotted \frac {1} {\sqrt{(F)}} vs. x and fitted these data points (linear).

According to an interpolation formula the extension x of a worm like chain with contour length L_0 (Bustamante et al.,1994) is:

\frac{FP}{k_BT}= \frac{1}{4} \Big( 1-\frac{x}{L_0}\Big)^{-2} -\frac{1}{4} + \frac{x}{L_0}, applicable for extensions \frac{x}{L_0}<0.97

Thus the y-intercept of the straight line fitted to the data as described above is 2\sqrt{\frac{P}{k_BT}}.

When I calculate P this way, I get values between ~2.7 nm (when I choose a force range beween ~6-17pN, which is roughly linear, and the dsDNA molecule behaves as a Hookean spring). However these values are far below the expected value for the persistence length of dsDNA (50nm).

Does anyone see what' s wrong with my approach ?


Thanks a lot for help

Pen


P.S. please find attached the F-x-graph and the 1/sqrt(F)-x-graph
 

Attachments

  • x vs (1 over F squared).jpg
    x vs (1 over F squared).jpg
    16.2 KB · Views: 781
  • F-x-curve.jpg
    F-x-curve.jpg
    12.1 KB · Views: 680
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I find your 1/√F plot to have a y-intercept of 1.4
 
then unfortunately the plot was for a different force range, however in case the intercept is 1.4, the persistence length would be ~2nm (still much too low).
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K