Calculate Planet Radius: Trig & No Calculator

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnsholto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planet Radius
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the radius of the planet based on the observer's height and angle to the horizon, trigonometry is essential. The observer, positioned 100m above sea level, sees the horizon at an angle of 5mrad below the horizontal. By drawing a circle representing the planet and using right-angle triangles, the relationship between the radius and the observer's height can be established. The small angle approximation helps simplify the calculations, leading to an estimated radius of approximately 8,000,000 meters. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the trigonometric principles involved rather than relying solely on calculators.
johnsholto
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
A person stands on a cliff overlooking the sea. He is 100m above the sea level and he observes the horizon to be 5mrad below the local horizontal.

How do you calculate the radius from this information without using a calculator? Trigonometry I am guessing, but I need a better hint.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Always draw the picture.

Place an origin O and draw a circle radius R about it. That's your planet.

The observer is at point A, a distance R+h from O - draw the line OA.
The point B, on the circle, is where the tangent to the circle also goes through point A.
The angle between BA and the tangent to OA (through A) is ##\alpha##.

In your case, h=100m and ##\alpha##=5mrad.
This will give you two right-angle triangles to work your trig on.
You may be able to make an approximation based on h<<R.
 
I tried it with:

AB^2 + R^2 = (R+100)^2

AB = (R+100)sinA

But i can't solve the equation without the calculator.
 
Why do you need to solve it without a calculator?
 
Punishment.

Alas, I just remembered small angle approximation.

cosA = 1-(A^2/2)

cosA = R/R+100

R ≈ 8000000

I did not enjoy this problem.
 
hehehe well done.
They get easier.

@hallsofivy: I suspect that it's part of the instructions in the homework - however: does not mean that a calculator cannot be used to figure out how to do it without a calculator.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top