Calculate Speed After 2-D Collision: 12kg Ball, 7kg Ball

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicphillic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speeds of a 12kg ball and a 7kg ball after a 2-D collision where the balls are deflected at 60 degrees apart. The user initially struggles with setting up the momentum equations correctly for both x and y components. They consider ignoring mass in their calculations, believing it can be canceled out, and question whether the approach differs for elastic versus inelastic collisions. After applying conservation of momentum, they derive the speeds of both balls to be 2.885 m/s each. The user seeks confirmation on the accuracy of their calculations and efficiency of their method.
Physicphillic
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Question: A 12kg ball traveling at 5 m/s strikes a stationary ball of 7kg. After the collision the balls are 60 degrees apart, each 30 degrees either side of the original path of the striking ball.

Calculate the speed of both balls after collision?

My attempt to split into x,y coordinates v1(intial) 12kg x 5m/s cos(0) = 60 for x
v1(initial) 12kg x 5m/s sin(0) = 0 for y

v2(initial) = 0 for x due to velocity
0 for y due to velocity

For after collision: v1(after) = 12kg x v1(after)cos(30) = ? for x
12kg x v1(after)sin(30) = ? for y

And v2(after) 7kg x v2(after)cos 30 for x
v2(after) 7kg x v2(after)sin30 for y

not sure how to use these equations to get the results, is it to do with vector cross product, or simply simultaneous equations, either way I'm stuck.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For one thing, you need to work on how you write equations! You say "v1(after)= " and then the right side is the momentum, not the x coordinate of velocity.

You should have two equations, one for the x coordinate and one for the y coordinate, that say that the x component of momentum before the collision equals the the sum of the two x components of momentum after the collision and the same thing for the y component.
 
Thanks for reply, this is my very first posting; I have noticed online several questions like this do not quote mass. So can I ignore this by simply cancelling out the term 'm' from momentum calculations?

Here is my attempt, I'm following a similar example without mass and also following an example that states from the outset it is elastic whereas mine does not.

Would there be a different technique if it is inelastic or elastic? I'm thinking not as momentum is conserved regardless?

Anyway here is my attempt with different equation layout

u = velocity of striking ball after collision
v = velocity of the struck ball after collision

for the x-axis momentum to be conserved, momentum before = momentum after

m x 5.00 m/s + 0 = (m x u cos 30) + (m x v cos 30)

My plan is to ignore mass values given so;

u cos30 + v cos30 = 5.00 m/s

u (cos 30 / cos 30) = (5.00 / cos 30)

1.0 u+v= 5.77 m/s (eqn 1)


Using conservation laws along the y-axis


m u sin 30 = m v sin 30

u (sin30/sin30) - v = 0

1.0 u-v = 0 (eqn 2)

From eqn 1 and 2 added together we get 2u = 5.77

so u (the speed of the striking ball is 2.885 m/s


and v the speed of the struck ball is found from the 1.0 term (in eqn 2) multiplied by the speed of the striking ball now

So it is also 2.885 m/s

Is this wrong, if so could you tell me where - if it is right was there a much more efficient way to go about it

Thanks
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top