Calculate Sunset Local Time: 36N, 6E | Hour Angle, Declination Angle & More!

  • Thread starter Thread starter antonyda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Local Time
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the sunset local time for the coordinates 36N, 6E, the apparent solar time is given as 17:45. The hour angle was calculated as 86.25 degrees, but the declination angle could not be determined without the specific day number and month. An attempt to calculate the declination angle resulted in a value of -5.144, which is incorrect as it yielded a negative day number. The time correction factor for this calculation is noted as 1 hour. Further information on the date is necessary to accurately determine the sunset time.
antonyda
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
calculate the sunset local time for a location : latitude = 36 N , longitude = 6 E
if the apparent solar time at this moment was 17h,45 , and ?
i started with hour angle h = 86.25 , after that i tried to determine the declination angle d but i don't have the day number and the month , also that for equation of time i can't determine and for the solar altitude angle =0 since for sunset and sunrise so i calculated the declination angle of solar altitude relation and i get a d= -5.144 and when i tried to calculate the day number of declination angle i had a negative value and that's wrong
so what to do
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the time correction factor = 1 hour
 

Attachments

  • 20150522_163116.jpg
    20150522_163116.jpg
    57 KB · Views: 483
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top