Calculate the rms speed of one nitrogen molecule at 27 Celcius

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the root mean square (rms) speed of a nitrogen molecule (N2) at 27°C (300 K) using the formula sqrt(v^2) = sqrt((3kT)/(m)). The correct application of Boltzmann's constant (k = 8.62 x 10^-5 eV/K) and the molecular mass of nitrogen (m = 28.0134 g/mol) is crucial. The final calculation yields an rms speed of approximately 465.09 m/s after correcting for unit conversions and using the mass of a single nitrogen molecule instead of a mole.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the ideal gas law and kinetic theory of gases
  • Familiarity with Boltzmann's constant and its applications
  • Knowledge of unit conversions between eV and J
  • Basic skills in algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the ideal gas law and its implications for molecular speed
  • Study the relationship between temperature and molecular kinetic energy
  • Explore the concept of diatomic molecules and their impact on calculations
  • Investigate the significance of Avogadro's constant in molecular mass calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or chemistry, educators teaching gas laws, and anyone interested in molecular dynamics and thermodynamics.

KUphysstudent
Messages
40
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Calculate the rms speed of one nitrogen molecule at 27 celsius

Homework Equations


sqrt(v^2) = sqrt((3kT)/(m))

The Attempt at a Solution


sqrt(v^2) = sqrt((3kT)/(m))
k = 8.62*10^-5 eV/K
T = 300 K
3kT = 0.078 eV
m = 14 g/mol
m = 0.014 kg/mol

3kT/m = 0.078 eV/0.014 kg/mol = 5.571
if 5.571 was 557.1 m/s I would assume it was correct but I doing something completely wrong here, any help will be appreciated. edit nevermind that statement since I have to take the sqaure root also

sqrt(5.571)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
KUphysstudent said:
27 Kelvin
 
Yea sorry it is 27 celsius which is 300 K :)
 
KUphysstudent said:
nitrogen molecule
Diatomic molecule.
 
Bystander said:
Diatomic molecule.
increasing the weight of the molecule does not solve the problem when you would expect it going about 500 m/s on average.
 
300 m/s: eV conversion, or something equally fatal.
 
KUphysstudent said:
3kT/m = 0.078 eV/0.014 kg/mol = 5.571
Units?
 
DrClaude said:
Units?

3kT/m = 0.078 eV/0.014 kg/mol = 5.571 eV*kg/mol
 
KUphysstudent said:
3kT/m = 0.078 eV/0.014 kg/mol = 5.571 eV*kg/mol
And how do you go from there to (m/s)2?
 
  • #10
DrClaude said:
And how do you go from there to (m/s)2?
1 eV = 1.6 * 10^-19 J, so adding this to the 3kT/m = (0.078 eV *(1.6 *10*-19 J))/0.014 kg/mol = 8.9264^-19 kg*J/mol
J = N*m = (kg*m^2)/s^2
8.9264^-19 kg^2*m^2/s^2*mol
hmm something fishy is going on here, no idea how kg^2/mol relate if they do at all

Oh wait.
it is 8.9264^-19 m^2/s^2*mol
Still have the 1/mol problem though
 
  • #11
KUphysstudent said:
Still have the 1/mol problem though
Yes, because you are taking m as the mass of one mole of atomic N, not as the mass of one molecule of N2.
 
  • #12
According to my book Boltzmann's constant is 8.62*10^-5 eV/K
but every place online I look at problems similar they use 8.3145 J/mol*K
and if I do this problem method I have seen online, I get 3*(8.3145 J/mol*K)(300 K) / 0.014 kg/mol = 5.345^5 J/kg which makes the units a lot easier to process for me, kg *m^2/ kg*s^2
which gives sqrt(5.345^5 m^2/s^2) = 66.049 m/s , which is still quite slow but better.
 
  • #13
KUphysstudent said:
According to my book Boltzmann's constant is 8.62*10^-5 eV/K
but every place online I look at problems similar they use 8.3145 J/mol*K
Your value for the Boltzmann constant is correct. The other you cite is the gas constant, defined as ##R = N_A k_B##, where ##N_A## is the Avogadro constant. It is used mostly by chemists.

KUphysstudent said:
and if I do this problem method I have seen online, I get 3*(8.3145 J/mol*K)(300 K) / 0.014 kg/mol = 5.345^5 J/kg which makes the units a lot easier to process for me, kg *m^2/ kg*s^2
You are still not taking into account that you have diatomic molecules of N2.

KUphysstudent said:
which gives sqrt(5.345^5 m^2/s^2) = 66.049 m/s , which is still quite slow but better.
That should be 5.345×105, not 5.3455.
 
  • #14
DrClaude said:
Yes, because you are taking m as the mass of one mole of atomic N, not as the mass of one molecule of N2.
Oh yea I am missing Avogadro's constant and I also forgot 1 atom is not 1 molecule.

(28.0134 g/mol) / (6.02*10^23 mol^-1) = 4.65*10^-23 g = 4.65*10^-26 kg

3*(8.62*10^-5 eV/K)*(300 K) / (4.65*10^-26 kg) = 1.6092^29 m^2/s^2

v = sqrt(1.6092^29 m^2/s^2) = 990.479 m/s
that is more like it, now it is super fast. thank you very much for all your help :)
 
  • #15
DrClaude said:
Your value for the Boltzmann constant is correct. The other you cite is the gas constant, defined as ##R = N_A k_B##, where ##N_A## is the Avogadro constant. It is used mostly by chemists.You are still not taking into account that you have diatomic molecules of N2.That should be 5.345×105, not 5.3455.
took me some time to write the above, but thank you for clarifying :)
 
  • #16
KUphysstudent said:
3*(8.62*10^-5 eV/K)*(300 K) / (4.65*10^-26 kg) = 1.6092^29 m^2/s^2
The number is not correct for units of m2/s2

KUphysstudent said:
v = sqrt(1.6092^29 m^2/s^2) = 990.479 m/s
that is more like it, now it is super fast. thank you very much for all your help :)
That speed is not the correct one, it is too big. Are you converting from eV to J correctly?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KUphysstudent
  • #17
DrClaude said:
The number is not correct for units of m2/s2That speed is not the correct one, it is too big. Are you converting from eV to J correctly?

No it looks like I made a mistake with the power.
28.0134/6.02*10^23 = 4.6533^-23
(3(8.62*10^-5)(300))/(4.65*10^-26) = 1.66838*10^24
sqrt(1.66838^24) = 465.09 m/s
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K