Calculate the wave number corresponding to the most energetic spectral line

  • Thread starter Thread starter atsum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Wave
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the wave number for the most energetic spectral line in the Lyman series of the hydrogen atom. A participant initially calculated the wave number using Rydberg's constant but received feedback that the answer was incorrect. The issue highlighted is the discrepancy in significant figures, as the Rydberg constant was provided with three significant figures, while the calculated answer had eight. This suggests that the precision of the final answer must match the significant figures of the constants used in the calculation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of maintaining consistent significant figures in scientific calculations.
atsum
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Calculate the wave number corresponding to the most energetic spectral line in the Lyman series for the hydrogen atom.
Express your answer to six significant figures and include the appropriate units.

I use the formula:
http://i.imgur.com/YgLVY.jpg

Because the question asks the most energetic one, so
[wave number = Rydberg's constant/h/c]
I got the answer10974214m-1
But the answer is wrong.
What's wrong with my calculation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What makes you think the answer is wrong?
 
Borek said:
What makes you think the answer is wrong?

I did it in MasteringChemistry. It says the answer is wrong.
 
If you are given Rydberg's constant with three significant figures, you can't give the answer with eight.

Not that I am sure that's the problem, but it surely can be one.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top