Calculate Time to Lift Piano: 132kg Piano, 7.3m High, 470W Power

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikefitz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Piano
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the time required to lift a 132 kg piano to a height of 7.3 meters using a crane with a power output of 470W, one must consider the work done against gravity. The potential energy at the top is approximately 9452.916 Joules, which can be calculated using the formula PE = mgh. The power of the crane indicates the rate at which work is done, allowing the time to be determined by the equation time = work/power. The discussion highlights a misunderstanding of energy conservation, clarifying that the crane adds energy to the system, which is essential for lifting the piano. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately calculating the lifting time.
mikefitz
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
A piano whose mass is 132 kg is being lifted at a steady speed from ground level straight up to an apartment 7.3m above the ground. The crane that is doing the lifting produces a steady power of 470W. How much time does it take to lift the piano?

Sorry for so many topics, I do appreciate the help though!

anyway, I know that the sum of KE and PE on the ground should be equal to KE and PE at the top ..

KEground = .5 * 132 * v^2
PEground = 0

KEtop = .5 * 132 * v^2
PEtop = 9452.916


My question is how do I find the time it takes to lift the piano if I don't know what the velocities are? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps it would be helpful to think of power as the rate at which work is done. Also, think about what units work is measured in.

You mentioned "velocities"... constant velocity; v = v.

Your error is thinking that the sum of the KE and PE at the bottom is the same as the sum of the KE and PE at the top. There's one thing missing from that equation...
 
drpizza said:
Your error is thinking that the sum of the KE and PE at the bottom is the same as the sum of the KE and PE at the top. There's one thing missing from that equation...

I thought that energy being conserved meant that the energy from the point of origin was equal to the energy at its destination...since this isn't true I'm unsure as to what I'm missing :confused: ?
 
The machine is doing work on the system... i.e. it's adding energy.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top