Calculate work done on an object

  • Thread starter Thread starter alexpratt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work Work done
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work done by a force F = (4.37xi + 3.01yj) N on an object moving in the x direction from the origin to x = 5.06 m, one must consider the force's x-component as a function of x. The direct multiplication of the force and distance is incorrect because the force varies with position; thus, integration is necessary to find the area under the curve. For a linear function, the area can be calculated using the triangle area formula, which simplifies the process. While integration is essential for non-linear functions, it is not a concern at the current level of study. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately calculating work done in physics.
alexpratt
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A force F = (4.37xi + 3.01yj) N acts on an object as it moves in the x direction from the origin to x = 5.06 m. Calculate the work done on the object by the force.

Homework Equations



dot product

The Attempt at a Solution



i took the dot product, FxDx+FyDy
since there is no y component for the distance i assumed it would just be FxDx but its not and now i have no idea where to go.
Unless I am just completely screwing up the math but i don't think i am considering its multiplication...

(4.37)(5.06) = 22.11 Nm?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your right that there is no 'y' or 'j' direction component. But you can't simply multiply (4.37)(5.06) to get the answer. This is because the component in the 'x' or 'i' direction is a function of x. It is equal to 4.37x so its a linear function. Since its a function you must integrate it to find the 'area' under the curve from x=0 to x=5.06.
 
i haven't done integration yet
unless i just wasn't paying attention...
is that the only way to do it?
 
Well since for integration your simply trying to find the area under the curve from 'a' to 'b' and your curve is simply a line with slope 4.37 how would you find the area under that line?
 
i figured it out on my calculator, but i can't use it on my exams.
though I'm assuming with a linear function i can just plug in the x value to get the y value and then make a triangle and solve the area with bh/2

if it was any other function id be lost haha, thank you though, i got the right answer both ways
 
alexpratt said:
I'm assuming with a linear function i can just plug in the x value to get the y value and then make a triangle and solve the area with bh/2

You are correct.

For other functions other than constant or linear you will pretty much need to use calculus or numerical integration (which is again essentially calculus applied to functions that aren't known or well behaved) I wouldn't worry much about it until you get to that level.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top