Calculating .001^100 on TI-83: Results & Accuracy

  • Thread starter Thread starter CarbonBased
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ti-83
AI Thread Summary
Calculating .001 raised to the 100th power on a TI-83 results in zero due to the calculator's limitations in handling very small numbers and rounding errors. The calculator interprets the result as negligible, equating it to zero. In contrast, more advanced models like the TI-85 and TI-89 can provide a more accurate representation, showing results in scientific notation. Users seeking precise calculations for extremely small numbers may need to use online arbitrary precision calculators or different calculator models. This discussion highlights the importance of understanding calculator capabilities when performing complex mathematical operations.
CarbonBased
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This is probably an ignorant question...but why when I attempt to calculate .001 to the 100th power on my TI-83 does it give me an answer of zero? Is the calculator assuming that the answer is so close to zero that it is negligible? If so, that's probably not the accuracy I'm looking for.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yup, the calculator sees it just like a 0. Calculators can't store numbers with inifinite digits, plus you get roundinig erros with very small numbers.
 
.001 = 10^(-3)

.001^(100) = (10^(-3))^100 = 10^(-300) = 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
 
My TI-84+ can't handle anything with exponents greater than 99 or less than -99, probably some sort of memory limitation. I don't think the 83 is any better. You can probably find better arbitrary precision calculators online, or the TI-89 seems to handle this calculation fine. (Although, for something like this, you would just figure it out normally like Diffy did.)
 
Last edited:
That's interesting. Even in "scientific" or "engineering" mode, the TI83 gives an answer of "0E0".

The TI85 and TI89, however, give "1.00E-300".
 
Ok...that makes sense. And yea I suppose it's pretty simple to work out mentally; I just wanted to diagnose my TI's issues. Thanks for the insight:)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top