MHB Calculating (125 2/3)^2: 3-Square-Root-of-5

  • Thread starter Thread starter CSmith1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the expression (125 2/3)^2 and its simplification steps. Participants confirm the correctness of the calculations involving square roots and multiplication, emphasizing the relationship between squaring and taking square roots. There is a suggestion to solve multiple problems at once for efficiency, as well as a recommendation to learn LaTeX for better mathematical typesetting. A clarification is made regarding an error in the interpretation of the square root notation. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of precision in mathematical expressions and communication.
CSmith1
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
1) 125 2/3(125 1/3)^2

=( 3 square root 125)^2
=(3 square root 5x5x5)^2
=(3 square root 5 )^2 right so far?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
CSmith said:
1) 125 2/3(125 1/3)^2

=( 3 square root 125)^2
=(3 square root 5x5x5)^2
=(3 square root 5 )^2 right so far?

Looks correct to me. Why don't you try solving a few problems fully and post them all at once to make this more efficient? :) It's better to type too much than not enough with online math help.

Good job by the way on learning this stuff!
 
OK.



CONTINUED

3 SQUARE ROOT 5 X 3 SQUARE ROOT 5
=9(5 SQUARE ROOT 5)
= 25 square root 5
 
CSmith said:
OK.

CONTINUED

3 SQUARE ROOT 5 X 3 SQUARE ROOT 5
=9(5 SQUARE ROOT 5)
= 25 square root 5

You got part of it right. The 3's will combine into 9 so now you must calculate the square root bits. After multiplying 3*3 you have [math]\sqrt{5} \cdot \sqrt{5}[/math] remaining, which is multiplied together. A common fact that is useful in these problems is that squaring and taking the square root are opposite operations, so when you do both to one number, nothing happens.

[math]\sqrt{5} \cdot \sqrt{5}=( \sqrt{5})^2=5[/math]

Now what do you get for your answer?
 
CSmith said:
1) 125 2/3(125 1/3)^2

=( 3 square root 125)^2
=(3 square root 5x5x5)^2
=(3 square root 5 )^2 right so far?

Hi CSmith, :)

Note that, \((\sqrt[3]{5\times 5\times 5})^2=5^2\). But you have written, \((\sqrt[3]{5\times 5\times 5})^2=(\sqrt[3]{5})^2\) which is incorrect.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Hi CSmith, :)

I went through most of your posts and it seems to me that you are making a lot of effort to typeset the mathematics in them. I suggest you to learn a bit of LaTeX commands. It's very easy. :) For starters, you can read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f26/ section.

As an example let me show you how to typeset your question in LaTeX.

Code:
\[125^{\frac{2}{3}}=(125^{\frac{1}{3}})^2\]

\[=(\sqrt[3]{125})^2\]

\[=(\sqrt[3]{5\times 5\times 5})^2\]

\[=(\sqrt[3]{5})^2\]

This will produce,

\[125^{\frac{2}{3}}=(125^{\frac{1}{3}})^2\]

\[=(\sqrt[3]{125})^2\]

\[=(\sqrt[3]{5\times 5\times 5})^2\]

\[=(\sqrt[3]{5})^2\]

To make the equal signs align with each other you can use the "eqnarray" environment as follows,

Code:
\begin{eqnarray}

125^{\frac{2}{3}}&=&(125^{\frac{1}{3}})^2\\

&=&(\sqrt[3]{125})^2\\

&=&(\sqrt[3]{5\times 5\times 5})^2\\

&=&(\sqrt[3]{5})^2

\end{eqnarray}

will give you,

\begin{eqnarray}

125^{\frac{2}{3}}&=&(125^{\frac{1}{3}})^2\\

&=&(\sqrt[3]{125})^2\\

&=&(\sqrt[3]{5\times 5\times 5})^2\\

&=&(\sqrt[3]{5})^2

\end{eqnarray}

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
59
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top