Calculating Acceleration: Basic Question on F=ma in AP Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oliviam12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    F=ma
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of an astronaut and a satellite using Newton's second law, F=ma. The astronaut, with a mass of 75 kg, exerts a force of 180 N on the 1700 kg satellite, leading to an acceleration of -2.4 m/s² for the astronaut and approximately 0.106 m/s² for the satellite. Participants confirm that the mass of both the astronaut and the satellite is relevant for determining their respective accelerations. The calculations provided are correct, affirming the understanding of the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration. The conversation highlights the importance of grasping these fundamental physics concepts in an AP Physics context.
Oliviam12
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I know this is rather basic, but some how I confused myself... The question is:

An astronaut of mass 75 kg performs repair work on the 1700 kg satellite, while floating right next to it. He exerts a force of 180 N on the satellite.
What is his acceleration as a consequence of this, and what is the acceleration
of the satellite?

Ok, I know the force acting on the satellite is 180 N and the force acting on the astronaut is -180 N, because Newtons 3rd law (F=-F)

Now here is my main question. I know to solve I need to Use F=MA for both the astronaut and satellite but, is their mass relevant?

So is it:
Astronaut:
F/M =A
-180/75 =A OR -180/75=A
-2.4 m/(s^2) und =A

Satellite:
180/1700 =A or 180/0= A
.105882 m/s^2 =A und=A

Sorry, for asking such a duh! kind of question but, I am taking AP Physics as an online course and the grading policy is crazy and the teacher and course mat'ls are useless.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, their mass is relevant. The astronaut will move away faster than the satellite will. The formulas for the acceleration that you have are correct.
 
Thanks, I just needed someone to make sure I wasn't being stupid.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top