Calculating Acceleration on a Slope with Friction Coefficients

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fusilli_Jerry89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Slope
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the acceleration of a brick and sled system on a slope with friction. The brick weighs 2.0 kg and is on a 20 kg sled being pulled up a 22-degree slope by a 1000 N tension force. Two methods are presented: the teacher's method yields an acceleration of 45.5 m/s² for the sled, while the student's calculations suggest 40 m/s². Key points include the importance of analyzing the forces acting on each mass separately and correcting the misapplication of total mass in the equations. The teacher's method is deemed correct, but there are questions about the accuracy of the numerical results.
Fusilli_Jerry89
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
a 2.0 kg brick rides on a 20kg sled and is dragged upa22 degree slope by a rope witha tension of 1000 N. Theropeis parallel totheslope. The friction coefficient(both static and kinetic) between the brick and sled is 0.30 and between the sled and the ground is 0.15. Predict each mass's acceleration. I got 0.8 m/s/s for thebrick which I'm sure is right, and for the sled sled I got 40 m/s but the teacher says it is 45 m/s/s.

Teacher's method:
1000-20(9.8)sin22-0.15(22)(9.8)sin22-5.4=20a
a=45.5m/s/s

My method:
1000-81-30-5.4=22a
a=40m/s/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
Teacher's method:
1000-20(9.8)sin22-0.15(22)(9.8)sin22-5.4=20a
a=45.5m/s/s

My method:
1000-81-30-5.4=22a
a=40m/s/s
Since you realize that the brick and sled do not accelerate together, why do you use the total mass in your equation?

(FYI: Getting useful help will be easier if you post your work using symbols, not just numbers.)
 
well doesn't the brick on top add to the force of gravity, which in turn would increase the force of friction and the other force which directs down the slope?
 
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
well doesn't the brick on top add to the force of gravity, which in turn would increase the force of friction and the other force which directs down the slope?
You need to look at the sled and the brick separately and consider all the forces acting on each object. Draw a free body diagram for each of them. Correct the things highlighted by Doc Al

In your last equation, the mass that multiplies a is just the mass of the sled, not the mass of sled plus brick. In your "81" you have included a force that is acting only on the brick as if it were acting on the sled.

The teacher's method is correct, but the numerical value seems a bit off.

I'd like to see how you calculated the 0.8m/s^2 acceleration of the brick. It would be interesting to calculate the total force acting on the brick if the sled were not moving.
 
Last edited:
For the brick: 0.30(19.6)cos22-19.6sin22=2a
 
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
For the brick: 0.30(19.6)cos22-19.6sin22=2a
Looks good. How did you get 0.8 m/s^2 from that?
 
where does the 5.4 come from?
 
gunblaze said:
where does the 5.4 come from?
from 0.30(19.6)cos22 which is friction
 
shouldn't it be this for the sled:

1000-20(9.8)sin22-0.15(22)(9.8)cos22-5.4=20a
a=52.6m/s/s?
So the teacher is wrong?
 
  • #10
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
shouldn't it be this for the sled:

1000-20(9.8)sin22-0.15(22)(9.8)cos22-5.4=20a
This looks right.
a=52.6m/s/s?
Check your arithmetic.
 
Back
Top