Calculating Altitude of a Geosynchronous Satellite Orbiting Jupiter

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bashyboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Satellite
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the altitude of a geosynchronous satellite orbiting Jupiter, the satellite must maintain the same rotational period as the planet, which is 9.84 hours. The relevant equations involve gravitational force and angular velocity, leading to the calculation of the orbital radius. An initial attempt yielded an incorrect radius of 1.59 x 10^8 m, prompting a re-evaluation of the calculations. The altitude above Jupiter's surface is found by subtracting the planet's average radius from the calculated orbital radius. Ultimately, the correct altitude can be determined by ensuring proper unit usage and calculations.
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



A synchronous satellite, which always remains above the same point on a planet's equator, is put in orbit around Jupiter to study that planet's famous red spot. Jupiter rotates once every 9.84 h. Use the following data to find the altitude of the satellite above the surface of the planet. Jupiter has a mass of 1.90 \cdot 10^{27}~kg, and a mean radius of 6.99 \cdot 10^{7}~m.


Homework Equations


v= \large \sqrt{ \frac{GM_j}{R_j + h}} M_j mass of Jupiter; R_j average radius of Jupiter.

v= \large \sqrt{ \frac{GM_j}{r}}

v_{tan}=r\omega

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that in order for the satellite to continually be suspended above the same spot on Jupiter, they have to be rotating through the same angles and take the amount of time to rotate through those angles. Hence, \omega_j=\omega_s= \frac{2\pi}{35424~s} (I converted the hours to seconds).

I thought of using the first forumula; but when I substituted
v_{tan}=r\omega and tried to solve for r, it became rather difficult. And so, I opted to use the second equation and perform the same steps. I solved for r, r= (\large \frac{GM_j}{\omega^2})^{1/3}

After the final substitution, r= 1.59 \cdot 10^8 m. This, however, isn't the correct answer. What did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bashyboy said:
And so, I opted to use the second equation and perform the same steps. I solved for r, r= (\large \frac{GM_j}{\omega^2})^{1/3}

After the final substitution, r= 1.59 \cdot 10^8 m. This, however, isn't the correct answer. What did I do wrong?
You solved for r. What altitude does that correspond to?
 
Oh, I need to subtract the average radius from the value of r I found. Also, I just noticed that the mass of Jupiter was given in kg, should I have converted it into grams?
 
Bashyboy said:
Oh, I need to subtract the average radius from the value of r I found.
Right.
Also, I just noticed that the mass of Jupiter was given in kg, should I have converted it into grams?
No. Kg is the standard unit for mass.
 
You are asked about the altitude above the surface of Jupiter.
 
I got the proper answer. Thanks be to you both.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top