Calculating Angle in Two-Slit Experiment with High-Speed Protons

Click For Summary
In a two-slit experiment involving protons traveling at 0.825c, the wavelength is calculated using the relativistic momentum equation, p = mv, leading to a wavelength of approximately 1.6E-15 m. The angle for the second minimum is determined using the formula d*sin(theta) = (m + 1/2)*lambda, where m is set to 1. The initial approach yielded a very small angle, prompting a discussion on the need for relativistic calculations. It was clarified that small angles can be valid, but larger angles require slit separations comparable to the wavelength. The correct angle was ultimately found using the appropriate relativistic momentum considerations.
nnof55
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A stream of protons, each with a speed of 0.8250c, are directed into a two-slit experiment where the slit separation is 2.00 10-9 m. A two-slit interference pattern is built up on the viewing screen. What is the angle between the center of the pattern and the second minimum (to either side of the center)?

Homework Equations


p = mv
lambda = h/p
d*sin(theta) = (m + 1/2)*lambda

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried to first solve for the wavelength in the experiment by using p = mv. With this I get:
p = (1.673E-27)*(0.8250)*(3E8)
p = 4.14E-19

Then I solve for the wavelength using lambda = h/p:
lambda = (6.63E-34) / (4.14E-19)
lambda = 1.6E-15

Once I have the wavelength, I use the double slit formula from Young's Experiment to try and calculate the angle, by using m = 1 and then solving for arcsin:
theta = arcsin ( m*lambda / d)
theta = arcsin ( 1.5*(1.6E-15) / (2E-9))

However this gives me a very small angle which obviously is the incorrect answer.

Am I approaching this completely wrong, or am I just goofing up somewhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

For protons at 0.825c, you might want to calculate the relativistic momentum
 
Thanks! I was able to calculate the correct angle using the relativistic momentum equation!
 
Also, a small angle is not necessarily incorrect. To obtain large angles, the slit separation has to be comparable to the wavelength of the wave. Particles with large momenta will have very small wavelengths.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K