Calculating Angular Speed After Spoke Shortening in Rotating System

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the new angular speed of a rotating system when the length of spokes is shortened from an initial speed of 2.0 rev/s. Participants initially misunderstand the relationship between spoke length and angular speed, mistakenly suggesting a direct multiplication. However, the key concept is the conservation of angular momentum, not energy, which is crucial for determining the new angular speed. As the spokes shorten, the rotational inertia decreases, leading to an increase in angular speed. The final conclusion emphasizes that angular momentum conservation is the principle to apply in this scenario.
mandy9008
Messages
127
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The system of small objects shown in the figure below is rotating at an angular speed of 2.0 rev/s. The objects are connected by light, flexible spokes that can be lengthened or shortened. What is the new angular speed if the spokes are shortened to 0.10 m? (An effect similar to that illustrated in this problem occurred in the early stages of the formation of our Galaxy. As the massive cloud of dust and gas that was the source of the stars and planets contracted, an initially small angular speed increased with time.)

p8-47.gif



The Attempt at a Solution


I would think that you would just multiply 2.0 rev/s by the new length, 0.10m, which will give 0.20 rev/s. When I enter this, it tells me that my answer is off by a multiple of ten.
 

Attachments

  • p8-47.gif
    p8-47.gif
    3.4 KB · Views: 493
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: What's conserved as the spokes are shortened? How does shortening the spokes affect the rotational inertia?
 
energy is conserved. sometimes it helps me when i know the answer to get to it, so i looked in the back of my textbook for a similar question. In this question, the spokes were shortened to 0.5m and the final answer was 8 rev/s. could you help me this way?
 
mandy9008 said:
energy is conserved.
Actually, energy is not conserved. (It takes energy to pull in those spokes.) But something else is.
 
angular momentum is conserved?
 
mandy9008 said:
angular momentum is conserved?
Yes. That's what they are looking for. (The problem is not very clearly stated.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top