Calculating Archimede Force Work to Inflate an Underwater Syringe

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dall'Olio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the theoretical work required to inflate a leather balloon and a giant syringe underwater, both starting from a depth of 100 meters. The work needed to inflate both the balloon and the syringe is calculated to be 980,000 Joules, with Archimedean force propelling them to the surface. As the syringe rises, the air volume inside expands significantly due to decreasing hydrostatic pressure, leading to a net work calculation that does not violate energy conservation principles. The work done by Archimedean force is attributed to Earth's gravity acting on the surrounding water, while the inflation work is performed by a compressor. The analysis concludes that the syringe serves to illustrate air volume changes rather than indicating a gain in energy.
Dall'Olio
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I thought to go underwater 100 m below water level and there inflate a leather balloon, volume 1 m3, theoretical work required would be:
Po Vo = ro g h Vo = 980 000 Joule
where
Po pressure 100 m below water level
Vo leather balloon volume
g gravity acceleration
ro water density
h water depth ( 100 m )
Then, I let the balloon go and, pushed by Archimede force Fa, it goes up to the surface, theoretical work done by Archimede force to bring the balloon to the surface will be :
Fa*h= ro*g*V*h = 980 000 joule
We did not violate energy conservation, That’s good !
I thought to go back to 100 m below water surface, but , this time, to use a syringe, a giant one, say 15 m3 max capacity, I thought to remove the needle and install in its place a valve like those for inner tubes, a giant one. Starting with the syringe piston fully down, (syringe volume equal zero), I inflate 1 m3 inside the syringe, work required to inflate the 1 m3 is still 980 000 joule .
I let the syringe go, it goes pushed by Archimede force, but this time, as the syringe move up, outside the syringe the hydrostatic pressure, Px, decreases, compressed air inside the syringe move the piston end expands to volume Vx increasing according to ideal gas law:
Px Vx = costant
When the sysringe gets to the water surface, the air volume inside it is 11 time the volume inside the syringe when it was 100 m below water surface, that is to say at water surface air volume inside the syringe is 11 m3, as well as the archimede force is 11 time the initial force !
Theoretical work done by Archimede force to bring the syringe to the surface looks much bigger tham the one done for the leather ballon, but the work done to inflate the syringe was the same as the one to inflate the leather balloon !
By Inflating and rising the syringe under the water did we gain energy ? how much energy, let see :
x Reference axis , vertical, direction up ward, origin at the syringe in flatting point
h level of water surface in reference to defined x-axis
V0 syringe air volume at level zero
Vx syringe air volume at level x
P0 absolute air pressure inside the syringe at level zero
Px absolute air pressure inside the syringe at level x
Fax Archimede force acting on the syringe at level x
ro water density
g gravity acceleration
Infinitesimal work, dLa, done by Archimede force, Fax, to push up the syringe for an infinitesimal path dx is
dLa= Fax dx
considering :
Fax= ro g Vx
From ideal gas law
PxVx = PoVo ; Vx=PoVo/Px ; considerino also : Px= Po-ro g x
We get :
Fax= ro g P0 V0/(Po-ro g x) = - Po Vo /( x-P0/ro g)
Integrating Fax from level zero to level h, ( using notation “ln ass” for natural logarithm of the absolute value)
Work La done by archimede force :
L a= -Po Vo ( ln *** (h-P0/ro g)-lnass(-P0/ro g));
La = P0 V0 ( ln (h+10)-ln 10)
La = Po Vo ln ((h/10)+1)
Say L0 work done to inflate volume Vo at elevation
L0 = Po Vo
Net work obtained is :
L = Po Vo ( ln ((h/10)+1)-1)
Does it violate energy conservation ?
I think No, because work we called Archimede work was done by Earth gravity field, by attracting water heavier than the air, the air goes up. The work to inflate the syringe was done by the compressor.
The only scope of the syringe is to better visualize the air volume, we could have talk about an air bubble.
I can’t find a mistake, any comment would be appreciated.
Thanks, ciao.
Andrea Dall’Olio.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I had couple of stupid things, please consider this revised version

I thought to go underwater 100 m below water level and there inflate a leather balloon, volume 1 m3, theoretical work required would be:
Po Vo = ro g h Vo = 980 000 Joule
where
Po pressure 100 m below water level
Vo leather balloon volume
g gravity acceleration
ro water density
h water depth ( 100 m )
Then, I let the balloon go and, pushed by Archimede force Fa, it goes up to the surface, theoretical work done by Archimede force to bring the balloon to the surface will be :
Fa*h= ro*g*V*h = 980 000 joule
We did not violate energy conservation, That’s good !
I thought to go back to 100 m below water surface, but , this time, to use a syringe, a giant one, say 15 m3 max capacity, I thought to remove the needle and install in its place a valve like those for inner tubes, a giant one. Starting with the syringe piston fully down, (syringe volume equal zero), I inflate 1 m3 inside the syringe, work required to inflate the 1 m3 is still 980 000 joule .
I let the syringe go, it goes pushed by Archimede force, but this time, as the syringe move up, outside the syringe the hydrostatic pressure, Px, decreases, compressed air inside the syringe move the piston end expands to volume Vx increasing according to ideal gas law:
Px Vx = costant
When the sysringe gets to the water surface, the air volume inside it is 11 time the volume inside the syringe when it was 100 m below water surface, that is to say at water surface air volume inside the syringe is 11 m3, as well as the archimede force is 11 time the initial force !
Theoretical work done by Archimede force to bring the syringe to the surface looks much bigger tham the one done for the leather ballon, but the work done to inflate the syringe was the same as the one to inflate the leather balloon !
By Inflating and rising the syringe under the water did we gain energy ? how much energy, let see :
x Reference axis , vertical, direction up ward, origin at the syringe in flatting point
h level of water surface in reference to defined x-axis
V0 syringe air volume at level zero
Vx syringe air volume at level x
P0 absolute air pressure inside the syringe at level zero
Px absolute air pressure inside the syringe at level x
Fax Archimede force acting on the syringe at level x
ro water density
g gravity acceleration
Infinitesimal work, dLa, done by Archimede force, Fax, to push up the syringe for an infinitesimal path dx is
dLa= Fax dx
considering :
Fax= ro g Vx
From ideal gas law
PxVx = PoVo ; Vx=PoVo/Px ; considerino also : Px= Po-ro g x
We get :
Fax= ro g P0 V0/(Po-ro g x) = - Po Vo /( x-P0/ro g)
Integrating Fax from level zero to level h, ( using notation “ln ass” for natural logarithm of the absolute value)
Work La done by Archimedes force :
L a= -Po Vo ( ln *** (h-P0/ro g)-lnass(-P0/ro g));
Say L0 work done to inflate volume Vo at elevation
L0 = P Vo= ro g V0
Net work obtained is :
L = Po Vo ( ln 1/(1-(ro g h/P0)))- ro g V0
Does this violate energy conservation ?
I think No, because work we called “Archimedes work” was done by Earth gravity field, by attracting water heavier than the air, as a result the air goes up. The work to inflate the syringe was done by the compressor.
The only scope of the syringe is to better visualize the air volume, we could have talk about an air bubble.
Thanks, ciao.
Andrea Dall’Olio.[/QUOTE]
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top