Calculating atomic velocities from forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hypatio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges of calculating atomic velocities from forces using interatomic pair potentials. The user encounters unreasonably high values for acceleration, suggesting a misunderstanding of unit conversions, particularly in the context of potential energy and force calculations. There is confusion regarding the differentiation of energy with respect to distance and the appropriate use of charge in the force equation. Participants emphasize the need for clarity in calculations to identify errors. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate unit handling in molecular dynamics simulations.
Hypatio
Messages
147
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement

I am trying to use interatomic pair potentials to calculate forces from velocities, but I seem to arrive at ridiculous values.

2. Homework Equations (and 3. Solution attempt)

Consider that I have a potential function where (r is distance, E is potential energy, Ang is Angstroms)

dE/dr @ 3 Ang is about 0.0342 eV/Ang, or 3.42x10^8 eV/m, or in Joules: 5.48x10^-21 J/m.

Using the mass of oxygen, 1.34x10^-26 kg, and classical mechanics (a=F/m) this force should apply an acceleration of 4.1x10^15 m/s^2.

My calculated acceleration suggests that the velocity should change by on the order of meters per femtosecond, at least 10 orders of magnitude greater than what would make molecular dynamics simulations viable.

Have I made a mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to have confused your units ... E has units of volts per length ... so dE/dr would be volts per area?
Don't know why you are doing dE/dr anyway - don't you want something more like: E=dV/dr ?
F=qE ... what did you use for q?

I cannot figure what mistake you have made, though, unless I see your actual calculation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top