Calculating Average Lifetime of Particles at Rest

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the average lifetime of particles at rest, the formula tm = ts/[sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)] is used, where tm is the moving time, ts is the stationary time, v is the particle's speed, and c is the speed of light. The user initially input the speed as 2.0 x 10^8 m/s, which is incorrect; the correct speed is 2.0 x 10^6 m/s. When the correct values are used, the calculations yield the expected results. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurate input values in the formula to achieve the correct average lifetime. Properly applying the formula with the correct speed will resolve the user's confusion.
msimard8
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Heres the question before I say anything else

A beam of unknown elementary particles travels at a speed of 2.0 x 10^6 m/s. Their average lifetime in th ebeam is measrured to be 1.6 x 10^-8 s. Caclulate their average lifetime when at rest.

hmm I have no examples to go by. I figure I will have to use the formula

tm = ts/[sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)]

where tm is the time it takes when the object is moving (for example when viewing from Earth and ts is the stationary time, v is speed of the object and c is speed of light)

I tried to do this by plugging in the numbers as

ts=?
v=2.0x10^8 m/s
tm=1.6x10^-8

I didn't get the right answer of 1.2 x 10^-8 s so I am assuming I am wrong.
How do I do this correctly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you are using the right formula and I get the right answer when I plug the numbers in. If you tell us what answer you get perhaps we can tell you what you're doing wrong.

EDIT: just noticed you cited
I tried to do this by plugging in the numbers as

ts=?
v=2.0x10^8 m/s

as what you've input.

That could be the problem.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top