Calculating Average Net Force on a Car Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the average net force on a car accelerating from 50.0 km/h to 90.0 km/h in 12.0 seconds, it's essential to use SI units. The acceleration must be calculated in meters per second squared (m/s²) rather than kilometers per hour squared (km/h²) to ensure the force is expressed in Newtons (N). The discussion emphasizes the importance of converting all measurements to the SI system, which includes using meters for distance and seconds for time. Failure to do so results in incorrect units that do not represent force in Newtons. Proper dimensional analysis confirms that 1 Newton equals 1 kg·m/s², highlighting the necessity of unit consistency in calculations.
dance_sg
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
1) A student driving her 1.60 x 102 kg car at 50.0 km/h presses on the gas pedal and accelerates to 90.0 km/h in 12.0 s. What is the average net force applied by the car’s engine during this time interval?



2) v=vf-vi, f=ma, a=v/t



3) i found v by subtracting 90.0km/h by 50.0km/h. i also converted 12.0s to hours which gave me 0.003 repeated. Then i tried finding acceleration by dividing 40km/h by time. then i plugged that in the force formula and multiplied it by 1600kg, but when i find my answer, it is not one of the answers i can chose from.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your acceleration would be in units of km/h2. When you multiply this by kg, you get some unit of force, but it is certainly not Newtons!

You should convert everything to SI units.
 
what are SI units?
 
dance_sg said:
what are SI units?

Well, you should know this, because it's basically the first thing taught in introductory physics classes in school. In any case, the SI (Systeme International) unit system, also called the metre-kilogram-second unit system, is derived from the metric system and is a system of units in which everybody agreed that the metre, kilogram, and second would be the basic units of length, mass, and time, respectively. So the units of m, kg, and s are SI base units, and all other units are derived from them (i.e. all other units are combinations of these three). Actually there is one other SI base unit, the ampere, which measures current.

EDIT: It looks like I overlooked the kelvin, candela, and mole, but they are not relevant to problems involving motion.
 
ok, makes sense.
but the chioces given to me are all in Newtons..
 
dance_sg said:
ok, makes sense.
but the chioces given to me are all in Newtons..

The Newton is an SI unit. The point I was making is that if you don't use SI units for length mass, and time in your calculations, then the force you calculate won't be in Newtons. You should be keeping track of the units when you do your calculations so that you are aware of this.

A dimensional analysis:

[force] = [mass]*[acceleration] = [mass]*[length]*[time]-2

Therefore:

1 N = 1 kg m s -2

If you don't convert your distances from km to m and your times from h to s, then your force will be in units of kg km h -2, which is NOT a Newton and is therefore NOT SI.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top