Calculating Black Hole Matter Absorption and Its Impact on the Universe

  • Thread starter Thread starter AaronD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
AI Thread Summary
Calculating the total matter absorbed by known black holes is feasible by estimating the formation rates of black holes from stars and their accretion in binary systems. However, the mass consumed by black holes remains within the universe, contributing to its overall gravitational influence. When assessing the total matter in the universe, black holes are already factored into calculations through their gravitational effects on surrounding stars. The discussion reveals a deeper inquiry into whether matter consumed by black holes truly exits the universe, challenging the understanding of conservation laws in physics. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of black hole interactions and their implications for cosmic matter estimates.
AaronD
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I apologize i do not know if this question makes practical sense i am only a person interested in physics, Is it possible to calculate a rough estimate of all of the matter being absorbed by all known black holes in existence , and than to even more generally estimate the amount of UNKNOWN black holes in the universe (probably impossible) and the matter they may be consuming To see if it has a chance of having any affect at all on the calculations that were done to estimate how much matter was in the universe and if there would be a big crunch or an ever expanding universe.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The calculation certainly is possible, and I will sketch it out rather than give an actual calculation:

Knowing the rough percentage of stars which form are in the mass limit that will form a black hole, one can calculate the average black hole formation. Since black holes that form alone will likely never accrete appreciable amounts of matter, only that fraction of those in binary systems will. Certainly, judging by what we see happening in neutron star binaries (and some black hole binaries) the rate of accretion could be estimated. This would give a rough amount of how much matter has been consumed by black holes.

However, this is wholly irrelevant to your question because the mass that is consumed by black holes stays in our universe and still contributes to the fate of the universe problem by virtue of its gravity just like everything else.
 
I agree with Nabeshin. When calculating how much matter there is in the universe, we are already including the matter contained in black holes. For example, when figuring out how much matter we have in our galaxy, we look at stars to see how fast they are orbiting the center of the galaxy. This speed depends on the gravity of matter that is both seen (e.g. stars) and unseen (e.g. black holes and dark matter). So, from the speeds of stars at a variety of distances from the center of the galaxy, we can deduce how much matter--seen and unseen--the galaxy has. Similarly, when figuring out the average matter density of the universe, the effect of black holes is included.
 
Ahh see that is what interests me in physics so much, a month later after asking the question i finally realize that the question I asked wasnt the question i had at all. The REAL question i had was weather or not matter consumed by a black hole of ANY type leaves our universe in any REAL sense, and weather the laws of the conservation of matter as i understand them to be vanish when it comes to a black hole. Without this question my question could not be answered, and with this question my question seems rather ignorant to the laws of physics

Anyways thank you both for your answers, i do understand now (to the best of my ability)
I shall continue to learn :)
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top