Calculating Building Height with Free Fall Kinematics | Spider-Man Example

  • Thread starter Thread starter abhikesbhat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Building Height
AI Thread Summary
Spider-Man falls from a building, covering a distance of h, with h/4 in the last second of his fall. The discussion involves using kinematic equations to determine the height h. The correct approach separates the fall into two segments, with the first segment being three times the height of the last segment. After applying the equations and solving, participants confirm that the height h is approximately 273 meters. The calculations yield consistent results, affirming the accuracy of the solution.
abhikesbhat
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Spider-Man steps from the top of a tall building. He falls freely from rest to the ground a distance of h. He falls a distance of h/4 in the last 1 second of his fall. What is h?


Homework Equations


All kinematic equations with free fall.


The Attempt at a Solution


I separated the motion into 2 cases where there was one part three times higher than the other. I made a bunch of equations that lead to nothing. Apparently I don't understand this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which equations did you make? How do they lead to nothing?
 
Is it 276m?

What I did:

Let l = h/4

The Kinematics equation s = vit + 1/2 *at2

-l=v3l(1s) - 5*(1)2

gives (5-l) = v3

The distance spiderman moves before this is 3l, so using

vf2=vi2+2as

Vi is 0 since he starts from rest

so (5-l)^2=2*3*g*l

gives the quadratic equation l2-70x+25=0

Solving gives x = 0.358984 or 69.641

Multiply by 4 to get h.

I'm not sure if it's right though :rolleyes:
 
I made a bunch of equations that lead to nothing.

I think you just need the right 2 equations.

Focus on the time to fall. It falls 3/4 of the way in T1.

3/4*h = 1/2*g*T12

and

h = 1/2*g*T22

where T2 = T1 + 1

Solve for the total time and it's all down hill from there.
 
Thanks guys! That was a nice way to this problem LowlyPion. Also thanks physicsnoob93. I got 273m as my answer. I am pretty sure that's right after checking. Again thanks!
 
abhikesbhat said:
Thanks guys! That was a nice way to this problem LowlyPion. Also thanks physicsnoob93. I got 273m as my answer. I am pretty sure that's right after checking. Again thanks!
Not that it matters now, but I tried it both ways and they both give the same answer, 273m...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top