Calculating CDF of Max of IID Random Variables with CDF F(x) and PDF f(x)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the maximum of independent and identically distributed (IID) random variables, denoted as Max(X_1, X_2, ..., X_n). It highlights the misconception that the CDF of the maximum can simply be F(x), the CDF of the individual variables. An example using uniformly distributed IID variables illustrates that the maximum is biased towards larger values, making it unlikely for the maximum to be below a certain threshold. The probability of the maximum being less than a specific value decreases significantly as the number of samples increases. Understanding this bias is crucial for accurately determining the CDF of the maximum.
ekaveera100
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. X_1,X_2\cdots X_n\:\text{are IID Random Variables with CDF}\,F(x)\:\text{and PDF}\,f(x)\\<br /> \text{then What is the CDF of Random variable }\,Max(X_1,X_2\cdots X_n)

Homework Equations


3. \text{Since Y will be one among}\,X_1,X_2\cdots X_n,\text{why cannot its CDF be }\,F(x)\\\text{I need to know flaw in my answer}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ekaveera100 said:
1. X_1,X_2\cdots X_n\:\text{are IID Random Variables with CDF}\,F(x)\:\text{and PDF}\,f(x)\\<br /> \text{then What is the CDF of Random variable }\,Max(X_1,X_2\cdots X_n)

3. \text{Since Y will be one among}\,X_1,X_2\cdots X_n,\text{why cannot its CDF be }\,F(x)\\\text{I need to know flaw in my answer}


Intuitively, here's what's wrong with that. Take the simpler case of n IID random variables ##X_1,\ X_2,...X_n## uniformly distributed on [0,1]. If you take a samples ##x_1,\ x_2,...x_n## from these distributions, and you always choose the largest value, wouldn't you expect your answer to be biased towards the larger numbers in the interval? Suppose you take 20 samples and consider the largest value. It would be very unlikely for the max to be less than 1/2, wouldn't it? ##(\frac 1 2)^{20}## to be exact, even though each sample had an a priori probability 1/2 of being less than 1/2.
 
Back
Top