Calculating Center of Mass in Cylindrical Coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the center of mass (COM) of an inverted cone with constant density in cylindrical coordinates. The key equations used include the mass integral, \( m=\int\int\int_C \rho r \, drdzd\theta \), and the center of mass coordinates \( r_{CM}, z_{CM}, \theta_{CM} \). The correct interpretation reveals that due to symmetry, the COM lies on the z-axis, leading to the conclusion that \( r_{CM} \) and \( \theta_{CM} \) are undefined, while \( z_{CM} \) is calculated as \( \frac{3h}{4\rho} \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Cylindrical coordinate system
  • Integration techniques in multivariable calculus
  • Understanding of symmetry in physical systems
  • Basic knowledge of density functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the transformation of integrals from Cartesian to cylindrical coordinates
  • Learn about the implications of symmetry in center of mass calculations
  • Explore the concept of density functions and their impact on mass distribution
  • Review advanced integration techniques for complex shapes
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, particularly those studying mechanics and dynamics, as well as educators teaching multivariable calculus and its applications in real-world scenarios.

Potatochip911
Messages
317
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Determine the center of mass in cylindrical coordinates of a cone with constant density ##\rho(\vec{r})##. (The cone is inverted, i.e. it's thinnest point is at ##z=0##.)

Homework Equations


##m=\int\int\int_C \rho r \, drdzd\theta##
##\overline{r}=\int\int\int_C r\cdot r\, drdzd\theta##
##r_{CM}=\frac{\overline{r}}{m}##

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm quite confused about calculating the center of mass in cylindrical coordinates since my results don't make any sense intuitively. Since the integrations are pretty trivial I will just post how I calculated ##m## and then the results of the other integrals. ##m=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{h}\int_{0}^{\frac{Rz}{h}}\rho r\, drdzd\theta=\frac{\pi \rho R^2h}{3}##, ##\overline{r}=\frac{\pi R^3h}{6}##, ##\overline{z}=\frac{\pi R^2h^2}{4}##, ##\overline{\theta}=\frac{\pi^2 R^2h}{3}##, ##r_{CM}=\frac{R}{2\rho}##, ##z_{CM}=\frac{3h}{4\rho}##, ##\theta_{CM}=\frac{\pi}{\rho}##, now clearly these three values won't give the position of the center of mass, i.e. ##f_{CM}=(r_{CM}, \theta_{CM}, z_{CM})##. To me it seems like this will just give the center of mass with respect to each axis and therefore it doesn't make sense to have have a point defined by the three center of mass locations for each axis. Also the value for ##\theta_{CM}## does not make any sense, it doesn't even make sense how there can be a ##\theta_{CM}## when the cone has constant density.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You didn't say on which axis the cone is centred. I'll assume it's the z axis, as otherwise the cylindrical coordinates will be inappropriate for the calculations.
Then symmetry considerations dictate that the COM is on the z axis. So your result ##r_{CM}=\frac{R}{2\rho}## looks like it can't be correct. Also, ##\theta_{CM}## will be undefined, because the COM is on the z axis. THe only value that needs to be calculated is ##z_{CM}##.

Can you set out your calculations behind the results you quote?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Potatochip911
andrewkirk said:
You didn't say on which axis the cone is centred. I'll assume it's the z axis, as otherwise the cylindrical coordinates will be inappropriate for the calculations.
Yep it is along the z axis.

andrewkirk said:
Then symmetry considerations dictate that the COM is on the z axis. So your result ##r_{CM}=\frac{R}{2\rho}## looks like it can't be correct.
Yea my interpretation of this result is that it made sense when considering a cross section (Right Triangle) of the various radii.

andrewkirk said:
Also, ##\theta_{CM}## will be undefined, because the COM is on the z axis. THe only value that needs to be calculated is ##z_{CM}##.
\usepackage{amsmath}
I was hoping to find ##r_{CM}=0## despite the fact that it is clear by symmetry this will be the result.

Can you set out your calculations behind the results you quote?
Ok... with ##m=\frac{\pi\rho R^2h}{3}##.
$$\overline{r}=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{h}\int_{0}^{\frac{Rz}{h}}r^2\,drdzd\theta=2\pi\int_{0}^{h}\frac{r^3}{3}\Big |_{0}^{\frac{Rz}{h}}dz=\frac{2\pi R^3}{3h^3}\int_0^{h}z^3\,dz=\frac{2\pi R^3}{3h^3}\frac{h^4}{4}=\frac{\pi R^3h}{6} \\
\overline{z}=\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^h\int_0^{\frac{Rz}{h}}rz\,drdzd\theta=2\pi\int_0^h \frac{R^2z^2}{2h^2}z\,{dz}=\frac{\pi R^2}{h^2}\frac{z^4}{4}\Big |_0^h=\frac{\pi R^2h^2}{4}\\
\overline{\theta}=\int_0^h\int_0^{\frac{Rz}{h}}\int_0^{2\pi}r\theta\,d\theta drdz=2\pi^2\int_0^h\int_0^\frac{Rz}{h}r\,drdz=\pi^2\int_0^h\frac{R^2z^2}{h^2}dz=\frac{\pi^2 R^2}{h^2}\frac{z^3}{3}\Big|_0^h\\ \overline{\theta}=\frac{\pi^2R^2h}{3}
$$
Now to calculate the COMs:

$$r_{CM}=\frac{\overline{r}}{m}=\frac{R}{2\rho}\\
z_{CM}=\frac{\overline{z}}{m}=\frac{3h}{4\rho} \\
\theta_{CM}=\frac{\overline{\theta}}{m}=\frac{\pi}{\rho}
$$

Edit: It appears as though my mistake is calculating things such as ##r_{CM}## and ##\theta_{CM}##, to obtain the proper results all the integrals should start in cartesian and then be transformed into cylindrical which will give our answer in cartesian. By inspection this makes both the ##\overline{x}## and ##\overline{y}## integrals 0 since they will have a ##\cos\theta## and ##\sin\theta## term respectively and this will be integrated from 0 to 2##\pi##. The ##\overline{z}## integral remains the same and thus the COM becomes ##(0,0,\frac{3}{4}h)##
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K