Calculating Charge and Volume Density for Non-uniform Ball

  • Thread starter Thread starter zoso335
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Charge
zoso335
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"Charge is distributed spherically-symmetrically but nonuniformly within a ball of radius a. There is no charge outside the ball and no sheet-charge on its surface. The (radial) electric field is uniform within the ball, having the constant value Ea.
a.) Calculate the total charge.
b.) Calculate the volume charge density at any distance r<a from the center.
c.) Check that your answers to part a and part b agree.

Homework Equations


Gauss' Law. Differential form of Gauss' Law.

The Attempt at a Solution


Part a posed no problem to me, you just use Gauss' law in integral form over the sphere of radius a. This results in Q equating to Ea times the surface area of the sphere times epsilon nought.
Part b on the other hand is where I have a problem. If I use the differential form of Gauss' Law, \nabla\bullet E = \rho / \epsilon0 then taking the gradient of a constant electric field would result in zero, and thus the volume charge density would be zero, but that physically does not make sense, so that is where I'm lost.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electric field is only constant in magnitude, it's not constant in direction. The divergence isn't zero. I'd suggest you stick with the integral form and figure out how Q(r) varies with r.
 
That's interesting though because my professor sent out and email giving hints, and for the volume charge density he suggested using Gauss' Law in differential form. So...there must be something I'm not doing right with that.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top