Calculating <\chi_3|H|\chi_3> w/ Dirac Notation Algebra

roro-rose
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Say we have,
|\chi_3>=|a+ib> and we want : <\chi_3|H|\chi_3>

is it correct to say:
<\chi_3|H|\chi_3>= <a|H|a>+<a|H|ib>+<-ib|H|a>+<-ib|H|ib> ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(Hint: learn how do latex on this forum. I've adjusted your stuff below accordingly.
Click on any of the expressions to get more info.)

roro-rose said:
Say we have,
<br /> |\chi_3\rangle=|a+ib\rangle ~~\mbox{and we want:}~~ \langle\chi_3|H|\chi_3\rangle<br />

is it correct to say:
<br /> \langle\chi_3|H|\chi_3\rangle ~=~ \langle a|H|a\rangle ~+~ \langle a|H|ib\rangle<br /> ~+~ \langle -ib|H|a\rangle ~+~ \langle -ib|H|ib\rangle ??<br />

That's almost right, except that bras are antilinear, hence
<br /> \langle ib| ~=~ -i \langle b|<br />

So, e.g, your 3rd term should be
<br /> \langle ib|H|a\rangle ~=~ -i \langle b|H|a\rangle<br />

HTH.
 
It really depends on what you mean by |a+ib\rangle, which is not a standard notation. Do you mean |a\rangle+i|b\rangle? if so, then strangerep's correction of your result is the right answer.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top