Confusion about Dirac Notation (interferometer)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Dirac notation employs "bras" () to represent row and column vectors, respectively. In the context of an interferometer with two photons, the notation |a, b> signifies a composite state where each photon is in a distinct quantum state, a and b. When only one photon is present in path a, the notation simplifies to |a, 0>. Understanding this notation requires familiarity with finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces and the distinction between state space and dual space elements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dirac notation and its components (bras and kets)
  • Familiarity with finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces
  • Knowledge of quantum states and quantum numbers
  • Basic concepts of quantum mechanics, particularly regarding interferometers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of composite quantum states in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the mathematical framework of finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces
  • Explore the role of quantum numbers in labeling quantum states
  • Investigate the behavior of photons in beam splitters and their representation in Dirac notation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists working with quantum states, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of Dirac notation and its applications in quantum systems.

Edge Of Pain
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,

Dirac notation uses "bras"(<a|) and "kets"(|b>), which are row vectors and column vectors respectively, but what would something like |a, b> mean? It makes no notational sense to me

Context: A couple of photons going through beam splitters in an interferometer. One is in state a and the other is in state b. If we had only 1 photon taking path a, and nothing in path b, then the notation becomes |a, 0>, but I don't know how to reconcile this with Dirac notation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Edge Of Pain said:
which are row vectors and column vectors respectively
This is significantly simplified and only makes sense in a finite dimensional Hilbert space. It is better to think about kets as elements in the state space and bras as elements in the corresponding dual space.

Edge Of Pain said:
but what would something like |a,b> mean?
States are usually labelled by their quantum numbers. In many cases, one quantum number is not sufficient, such as for eigenstates of the angular momentum squared. Without more information on what a and b are it is difficult to be more specific.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K