Calculating Clebsch Gordon Coefficients

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar_4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coefficients
quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the Clebsch Gordon coefficients of 1/2 \otimes 1 = 3/2 \oplus 1/2

Homework Equations



We have some properties of the CG coefficients which might be useful:

1) they are nonzero only if j is between j1-j2 and j1+j2
2) m = m1+m2 for nonzero coefficients
3) they are real

The Attempt at a Solution



I am horribly confused. I know that the CG coefficients are given as the coefficients in the expansion

|j m, j_1 j_2 \rangle = \sum_{m_1} \sum_{m_2} | j_1 m_1, j_2 m_2 \rangle \langle j_1 m_1, j_2 m_2| jm, j_1 j_2\rangle

or

\langle j_1 m_1, j_2 m_2 | j m \rangle

and I know that the possible |j m j1 j2> states are for the product space with j1 = 1, j2 = 1/2:

| \frac{3}{2} \frac{3}{2} ,1 \frac{1}{2} \rangle, | \frac{3}{2} \frac{1}{2},1 \frac{1}{2} \rangle, | \frac{3}{2} \frac{-1}{2} ,1 \frac{1}{2} \rangle, | \frac{3}{2}\frac{-3}{2} ,1 \frac{1}{2} \rangle, | \frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{2} ,1 \frac{1}{2} \rangle, | \frac{1}{2} \frac{-1}{2} ,1 \frac{1}{2} \rangle

but I don't understand what on Earth to do or where to even start. Any help would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You usually just look them up in a table. I hope your assignment doesn't want you to actually derive them. Also, I am a bit confused on your notation in the first sentence.
 
Yes, I think the notation is what's confusing me. I computed some of the coefficients a couple of years ago in an undergraduate class, but I've never seen this notation. I guess what the author means is to find the coefficients for all the basis kets in the product space where j1 = 1/2, j2 =1. There are (2*j1+1)*(2j2+1)=6 such kets.

I actually have figured it out - but boy, I think Shankar has weird notation...

All one needs do is to start with the maximal possible z component, and apply lowering operators for each given j value, along with applying orthogonality and normalization conditions. A bit tricky but doable...
 
Start with the | 3/2\mbox{ }3/2 \rangle state. You know that it has to correspond to |1/2\mbox{ }1/2; 1\mbox{ }1\rangle. Then apply the lowering operator to get | 3/2\mbox{ }1/2 \rangle, and so on.Edit: Oh sure, figure it out right before I post! ;)
 
Thanks anyway! It's good to know that my solution wasn't just pure nonsense :-)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top