Calculating Coefficient of Friction for Sandpaper

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the coefficient of friction for sandpaper, the angle of slippage between the bioplastic and the weight can be used, as it relates to the tangent of that angle. Friction is generally independent of contact area, but the actual friction force can vary based on the materials and their surface characteristics. The discussion highlights the importance of distinguishing between static and kinetic coefficients of friction, noting that friction can change once movement begins. The relationship between normal load and friction force is complex, especially with abrasive materials, which may not behave ideally. Actual measurements with the specific sandpaper are recommended to determine the coefficient accurately.
hello1910
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello Fellow Forum,

How would you calculate the coefficient of friction for sandpaper? I'm testing mechanical resistance of a bioplastic, and I'm going to attach the bioplastic to different weights, and then rub sandpaper over the bioplastics. The one that breaks will be used to find mechanical resistance. I know F=un- and n= the weight of the object the plastic was attached to, but how do you calculate u?
Thanks
hello1910
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The coefficient of friction is equal to the tangent of the angle where slippage is initiated.
 
Thanks for the quick reply! Just to clarify, the angle is between the bioplastic and the weight, right? And also, you're saying that mass has no effect on the coefficient of friction?
 
The friction is in direct proportion to the mass. Friction is often considered independent of contact area. If we want to change the friction we change the materials.

Does that mean a one tonne object on a 1 square mm leg is the same friction as on 100 square meter support. Not likely for normal materials.

Is it the same once movement starts? No. Is it constant at different velocities? It depends.

You are interested in the static coefficient of friction and the kinetic coefficient of friction.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friction

The science is tribology http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribology
 
Last edited:
The 'laws' of friction assume that there is elastic deformation of the surfaces to that the actual contact area (on a microscopic level) depends upon the normal load and not on the available area for contact between the surfaces - so that the friction force increases proportionally with the normal load - giving a 'constant' coefficient. This is an oversimplification for many situations. An abrasive paper is not likely to be that ideal - you could imagine the limiting case of barely visible grooves with vertical sides on both faces that could 'lock' together. The 'friction' force could be the same for all normal loads once the surfaces were in contact.
You would need to do some actual measurements with the abrasive that you are planning to use and find the range over which you have linearity.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top