Calculating Coherence Time: Understanding the Relationship Between g(t) and t_c

  • Thread starter Thread starter Observer Two
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coherence Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the coherence time, t_c, and its calculation using the function g(t) = e^{- |t| / t_c}. The user attempts to verify the equation t_c = ∫ |g(t)|^2 dt but encounters issues with the integral's value when evaluated from negative to positive infinity. They mistakenly calculate the integral without properly squaring the function, leading to confusion about the results. Clarification is provided that the correct approach involves recognizing that |g(t)|^2 requires multiplying g(t) by its complex conjugate. The user is encouraged to re-evaluate their integral with this correction in mind.
Observer Two
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have the complex term g(t) = e^{\frac{-|t|}{t_c}} which is the degree of the coherence.


Homework Equations



Now I want to verify that:

t_c = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \! |g(t)|^2 \, dt


The Attempt at a Solution



\int_{-\infty}^\infty \! |g(t)|^2 \, dt = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \! |e^{\frac{-|t|}{t_c}}|^2 \, dt = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \! e^{\frac{-|t|}{t_c}} e^{\frac{|t|}{t_c}} \, dt = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \! 1 \, dt

2 Problems now.

First: The integral doesn't have a value if I integrate from - infinity to infinity.
Second: The value of the indefinite integral is t. Not t_c.

What am I missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You didn't multiply ##e^{-\frac{|t|}{t_c}}## by itself. Instead, the second multiplier misses the negative sign. Check your work carefully and try again evaluating the integral.
 
Huh? I'm really missing something here.

|z|^2 = z z^*

So if in my case z = e^{\frac{-|t|}{t_c}} then

z^* = e^{\frac{|t|}{t_c}}

Or not?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top