Calculating Complex Integrals using Cauchy Formula on a Circular Path | z = 4

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating a complex integral using the Cauchy formula along a circular path defined by |z|=4. The integral in question is \oint_{L} \frac{ \mbox{d} z}{ z(z+3) }.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the assumptions regarding the orientation of the integral and the application of the Cauchy formula. Some participants discuss the correctness of the partial fraction decomposition and the implications of using specific substitutions for the integrals.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the integral's result, with some suggesting that the integral evaluates to zero. There is also a discussion about the location of the pole and the reasoning behind the residue at z=3.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions related to the orientation of the contour and the nature of the poles involved in the integral.

player1_1_1
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[tex]\oint_{L} \frac{ \mbox{d} z}{ z(z+3) }[/tex] and [tex]L:|z|=4[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


what is assumption, is it oriented positive or negative? and Cauchy formula, can it be done like this?
[tex]\frac{ 1 }{ 3 } \left( \oint_{L} \frac{ \mbox{d} z}{ z } - \oint_{L} \frac{ \mbox{d} z}{ z+3 } \right)[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If nothing else is said, the integral is assumed to be in the positive orientation, counter-clockwise.
Yes, your partial fraction reduction is correct and the integral can be done in that way. Letting [itex]z= e^{i\theta}[/itex] in the first integral and [itex]z= 3+ e^{i\theta}[/itex] in the second will give very simple integrals, giving the residues at z= 0 and z= 3.
 
thanks for answer, I got 0, is it possible? and please tell me why residue in 3, not -3?
 
Last edited:
up.,
 
player1_1_1 said:
thanks for answer, I got 0, is it possible? and please tell me why residue in 3, not -3?

Sure the pole is at -3. And 0 is right. In fact, it's generally true that if f(z) is a polynomial of degree greater than 1 then the integral is zero around a contour that encloses all of the poles.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K