Calculating Critical Angle: Relative vs. Absolute Refractive Index

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the critical angle in the context of refractive indices, specifically addressing the use of absolute versus relative refractive indices. Participants explore the conditions under which total internal reflection occurs and express confusion regarding the implications of relative refractive indices when calculating critical angles between two non-vacuum mediums.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether absolute refractive index is used when finding the critical angle and expresses confusion about the relative refractive index leading to sine inverse values greater than 1.
  • Another participant references Snell's law and discusses the conditions necessary for total internal reflection, specifically when the refractive index of the first medium is greater than that of the second.
  • There is a reiteration of the understanding that critical angles occur only when light travels from a denser medium to a less dense medium, which raises questions about the calculations leading to invalid sine values.
  • A challenge is posed regarding the participant's understanding of the critical angle, questioning why they encounter sine inverse greater than one if they are aware of the conditions for critical angle occurrence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express confusion and seek clarification on the relationship between absolute and relative refractive indices in calculating critical angles. There is no consensus on the resolution of these confusions, and multiple viewpoints regarding the interpretation of Snell's law and critical angles remain present.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the application of refractive indices, particularly in non-standard mediums, and the implications of using relative refractive indices in calculations. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps leading to sine inverse values greater than one.

Samurai44
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Greetings,
Do we use Absloute refractive index when finding crtical angle ?

if it was two mediums ( not vacuum or air) how would i calculate the critical angle ? I mean i get confused when I find relative refractive index because sometimes i get sine inverse greater than 1 which give no solution .

Thank you in advance.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Snell's law reads as ##n_1 \sin{\theta_1} = n_2 \sin{\theta_2} ##. Now if we assume ##n_1## to be greater than ##n_2## and ##\theta_2 = 90^0##, what will you end up with?
What can you then conclude for the requirement for ##n_1## and ##n_2## so that total internal reflection which is associated with critical angle can take place?
 
blue_leaf77 said:
Snell's law reads as ##n_1 \sin{\theta_1} = n_2 \sin{\theta_2} ##. Now if we assume ##n_1## to be greater than ##n_2## and ##\theta_2 = 90^0##, what will you end up with?
What can you then conclude for the requirement for ##n_1## and ##n_2## so that total internal reflection which is associated with critical angle can take place?

it will end up with ##n_1 \sin{\theta_1} = n_2 ? , n1 is denser than n2 since its greater than
I know the fact that critical angle occurs only from denser medium to less dense , and that's why I get confused when I find relative refractive index
 
Samurai44 said:
I know the fact that critical angle occurs only from denser medium to less dense ,
If you had known this, then why would you get sine inverse greater than one when calculating a critical angle?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
12K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K