Calculating Delta-V in Hohmann Transfer Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Solistics
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Calculating delta-v for a Hohmann transfer using the provided equation led to an unexpectedly small result of 0.00122149 m/s. The issue stemmed from an incorrect value for the gravitational parameter (μ), which should be calculated as GM, where G is the gravitational constant and M is the Earth's mass. The correct value for μ is approximately 4.651 x 10^14 m^3/s^2. Adjusting this value will yield a more accurate delta-v for the transfer. Proper calculations are essential for accurate orbital mechanics results.
Solistics
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I'm having some slight difficulties in calculating the delta-v in a hohmann transfer equation. I used the equation from wikipedia (which i hope is correct) but whenever i replace the variables i get an extremely small delta-v, is this normal?

\Deltav=\sqrt{}(\mu/r1)*(\sqrt{}(2*r2/(r1+r2)-1))

r1=6374000 meters
r2=405500000 meters
\mu=9.814

my final result was 0.00122149m/s
it seems like a really small number, is this right or I'm i doing something really wrong?

i attached an excel sheet to show you my work.

thanks in advance
 

Attachments

Astronomy news on Phys.org
Solistics said:
I'm having some slight difficulties in calculating the delta-v in a hohmann transfer equation. I used the equation from wikipedia (which i hope is correct) but whenever i replace the variables i get an extremely small delta-v, is this normal?

\Deltav=\sqrt{}(\mu/r1)*(\sqrt{}(2*r2/(r1+r2)-1))

r1=6374000 meters
r2=405500000 meters
\mu=9.814

my final result was 0.00122149m/s
it seems like a really small number, is this right or I'm i doing something really wrong?

i attached an excel sheet to show you my work.

thanks in advance

The problem is your value for \mu

\mu = GM

Where G is the universal gravitational constant and is equal to

6.67300 × 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2

and M in this case is the mass of the Earth, or 5.97 x 1024 kg

so

4.651 X 10^{14}m^3 s^{-2}
 
thanks for that correction.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top