Calculating Distance and Time for a Moving Car with Constant Acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter PerryKid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Running
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
PerryKid
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A car starts to run from rest with acceleration 0.5 m/s2. How long does it take to travel distance 60m? [sic] (I have a Russian teacher for AP Physics)

Homework Equations



V= (Xf-Xi)/(Tf-Ti)
ΔX= Vi*T+(1/2)aT2

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to find velocity, but that didn't really work out.
0.5 m/s2=Vf-Vi/Tf-Ti
Is there an equation or some way that I can directly solve for distance from acceleration?
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
ΔX= Vi*T+(1/2)aT2
from this equation, you are close to the answer already. What does Vi stand for here? and so what is its value?
 
Vi stands for initial velocity. It has an unknown value.
 
Last edited:
I got it in class. :frown:

This was the process:

(Vf-Vi)/(Tf-Ti)=A

Or rather... ΔV/ΔT=A

Since A= 0.5 m/s2, A=(0.5 m/s)/1 s

Thus, V= 0.5 m/s

The ratio is the same and thus (0.5 m)/(1 s)=(60 m)/(x s)

60 m*s = 0.5x m*s

120 s

:P

Thank you for putting up with me and with the odd grammar.
 
PerryKid said:
I got it in class. :frown:

This was the process:

(Vf-Vi)/(Tf-Ti)=A

Or rather... ΔV/ΔT=A

Since A= 0.5 m/s2, A=(0.5 m/s)/1 s

Thus, V= 0.5 m/s

The ratio is the same and thus (0.5 m)/(1 s)=(60 m)/(x s)

60 m*s = 0.5x m*s

120 s

:P

Thank you for putting up with me and with the odd grammar.

That can't be right. After 120 seconds with an acceleration of 0.5 m/s2 the car will have traveled 3.6 kilometers...that's more than slightly larger than 60 m.

What you've sort of calculated is the time it takes for the velocity to reach 60 m/s. Unfortunately, velocity is not the same as distance :smile:

Go back to your second equation (the one for ΔX) and take another look at the posts by BruceW and Chestermiller.