Calculating E-field of Uniformly Charged Sphere

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric field of a uniformly charged sphere using Coulomb's Law, begin by determining the electric field due to a ring of charge, which has been successfully calculated as E=Qr/(4πε₀(r²+R²)^(3/2)). Next, to find the electric field of a spherical shell, consider dividing the shell into infinitesimal rings and apply the superposition principle to sum their contributions. This will lead to an integral expression that can be simplified, especially noting that the electric field inside a conductor is zero. By following this method, you can ultimately derive the electric field both inside and outside the sphere.
Euclid
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
I need to calculate the electric field both inside and outside a sphere with a charge density p. The trick is I am required to use Coulomb's Law. I cannot appeal to Gauss' Law.

My instructor suggests considering the electric field due to a ring of charge. Then to use that result to find the electric field of a spherical shell. Finally, I will use that result to find the electric field due to a sphere.

I've done the first part with no problems, and my answer checks with the book. (R=radius of ring, r=distance along axis of ring)
E=\frac{Qr}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 (r^2+R^2)^{3/2}}
However, I am stuck on how to use this result to find the E field due to a spherical shell.

I begin by considering a "ring element" of radius r and I consider a point on the x-axis (which happens to coincide with the axis of the ring). I need to find the dE associated with this ring element, but it's not so simple. It should be dE=\frac{dQ(d-x)}{4\pi\epsilon_0((d-x)^2+r^2)^{3/2}} (d=x-coordinate of given point on x-axis, x=x-coordinate of plane through ring, r=ring radius) (this isn't showing up correctly: it's missing "dE" and "dQ") Here dQ, x, r are all changing and when I plug in the relations between them I get an ugly integral, that doesn't appear to come out with the 1/r^2 dependence. Any suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Using Coulomb's Law to calculate the electric field due to a uniformly charged sphere can be a bit tricky, but it is certainly doable. As your instructor suggested, you can start by considering the electric field due to a ring of charge. This will help you find the electric field of a spherical shell, and then you can use the result to find the electric field of a sphere.

To find the electric field due to a ring, you correctly used Coulomb's Law and found the expression E=\frac{Qr}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 (r^2+R^2)^{3/2}}, where Q is the charge of the ring and r is the distance from the center of the ring to the point where you want to find the electric field. This result is correct and can be used to find the electric field of a spherical shell.

To find the electric field due to a spherical shell, you can divide the shell into infinitesimal rings and use the superposition principle to add up the contributions from each ring. This will give you an integral expression, but it should not be too complicated. You can also use the fact that the electric field inside a conductor is zero to simplify the integral. Once you have the electric field due to the shell, you can use this result to find the electric field due to a solid sphere by considering the shell as a collection of concentric shells with varying radii.

In summary, to find the electric field due to a uniformly charged sphere using Coulomb's Law, you can start by considering the electric field due to a ring of charge. Then use this result to find the electric field due to a spherical shell, and finally use this result to find the electric field due to a solid sphere. With careful consideration and application of the superposition principle, you should be able to successfully calculate the electric field both inside and outside the sphere.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top