Calculating E-field Through Layers w/ Diff. Permittivities & Conductivities

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding how the total electric field varies as it passes through thin layers with different permittivities and conductivities. The user is trying to determine the profile of the normal component of the electric field along a specified line, initially assuming a stepped pattern due to the varying permittivities. However, they recognize that surface charge accumulation at the interfaces can create a secondary electric field, which complicates the calculations. Clarification is sought on whether this secondary field needs to be calculated and how to approach it. The conversation also touches on the steady-state conditions and the implications of finite versus zero conductivities on the electric field behavior.
ThomasAnderson
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand how the total electric field changes as it passes through layers with different electrical permittivities and conductivities (as shown in the linked figure). The rectangular prism layers are assumed to be very thin. The conductivities ##\sigma## and relative permittivities ##\epsilon_r## for the 5 layers as well as the surrounding medium are labeled. The external field ##E_0## is uniform. I'm hoping to find the profile of the total normal component of the E-field along the line A-A'.

I assumed that the profile would have a stepped pattern as shown in the right panel. For example, the electric field normal component inside layer 2 would be ##E_{n,2}=E_0/\epsilon_{r,2}##, and similarly for the other layers.

However, I also recall learning that there is a surface charge accumulation that occurs at the interfaces between each layer, due to the difference in conductivities. If I understand correctly, these surface charges create a secondary electric field. I don't know if I need to find this secondary field, and I'm not sure how I would calculate it. I would appreciate some guidance on this problem!

https://i.stack.imgur.com/UHQ7L.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do things vary with time or are you interested in steady state (after system settles)?
 
hutchphd said:
Do things vary with time or are you interested in steady state (after system settles)?

I was interested in the steady state
 
For any finite conductivities, the charge will migrate to the opposing surfaces and the field inside will be zero (ignoring edge effects). Not very interesting?

For all conductivities zero the Displacemant field D will be E0 and the local E will be εD rE0 in each slab. I think Griffiths does a nice job on this general subject.
 
  • Like
Likes ThomasAnderson
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top