Calculating Electric Field Flux for Non-Uniform Fields: Gaussian Cubes Example

  • Thread starter Thread starter vysero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Flux
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating electric field flux through Gaussian cubes in non-uniform electric fields, emphasizing that the total electric flux through a closed surface is determined by Gauss' law, which states that the flux equals the charge enclosed divided by epsilon knot. Participants clarify that if there is no charge enclosed, the total flux must be zero, leading to the conclusion that the flux through the remaining face of a cube can be determined by the known flux values of the other faces. For example, if the flux through five faces totals 40, the flux through the sixth face must be -40 to maintain a net flux of zero. The conversation highlights that this principle holds regardless of the electric field's distribution. Understanding this concept simplifies the calculation of electric flux in such scenarios.
vysero
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



6 Gaussian cubes are shown below. The surfaces are located within space containing non-uniform electric
fields. The electric fields are produced by charge distributions located outside the cubes (no charges in
the cubes). Given for each case is the side length for the cube as well as the total electric flux through 5
out of 6 of the cube faces. Determine the electric field flux through the remaining sixth face. Rank the
electric flux through the remaining side from greatest positive to the greatest negative. Electric field flux
is a scalar quantity and not a vector. A negative value is possible and would be ranked lower than a
positive value (X = 200, Y = 0, Z = -200 would be ordered X=1, Y=2, Z=3)2. Homework Equations

Q(enclosed)/E(knot)[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have a theory but I need a question answered first. Is the flux always equal to the charge enclosed divided by epsilon knot? Cause that would make this question easy to answer. However, if this is only true for a uniform electric field than that changes things. For instance, one of the cubes has a side length a = .5 m and the flux through 5 of the six sides is 40. Does that simply mean the flux through the sixth side must be -40? The reason I think that is because there is no charge enclosed, zero divided by anything equals zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vysero said:
Is the flux always equal to the charge enclosed divided by epsilon knot?
Yes, that's Gauss' law. (Total flux through a closed surface.)

vysero said:
Cause that would make this question easy to answer.
Don't fight it.

vysero said:
For instance, one of the cubes has a side length a = .5 m and the flux through 5 of the six sides is 40. Does that simply mean the flux through the sixth side must be -40?
Yep.

vysero said:
The reason I think that is because there is no charge enclosed, zero divided by anything equals zero.
The total flux is zero, and the total flux equals the sum of the flux through each side of the cube.
 
The net flux if the charge is not enclosed should be zero. It shouldn't matter how the field is distributed, whether inside or outside the boundary. This fact allows for the simplified determination of flux through surfaces
 
Awesome okay thanks guys!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top