Calculating Electric Field for 2 Test Charges

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the electric field components at the origin due to two test charges, q1 = -2.75 nC and q2 = 3.20 nC, located in the x-y plane. The Coulomb Force constant used is k = 8.99 × 10^9 N·m^2/C^2. The correct calculations yield E1 = 38.6 N/C in the positive j direction and E2 = -23.03 N/C in the i direction and -9.21 N/C in the j direction, resulting in total electric field components Ex = 23.03 N/C and Ey = -15.6 N/C. The direction of the electric field components is crucial, as the negative charge attracts a positive test charge towards it, while the positive charge repels it.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and electric field calculations
  • Familiarity with vector components and unit vectors
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions for angle calculations
  • Ability to convert units from nanocoulombs to coulombs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of electric field vectors and their directions
  • Learn about vector addition in the context of electric fields
  • Explore the implications of charge polarity on electric field direction
  • Investigate the effects of multiple charges on electric field calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators and anyone interested in understanding electric field calculations involving multiple charges.

jprforester
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two test charges are located in the x–y plane. If q1 = -2.75 nC and is located at x = 0.00 m, y = 0.800 m and the second test charge has magnitude of q2 = 3.20 nC and is located at x = 1.00 m, y = 0.400 m,

calculate the x and y components, Ex and Ey, of the electric field, , in component form at the origin, (0,0). The Coulomb Force constant is 1/(4*pi*ε) = 8.99 × 10^9 N·m^2/C^2

given:
q1 = -2.75 nC; x = 0.00 m, y = 0.800 m
q2 = 3.20 nC; x = 1.00 m, y = 0.400 m

Homework Equations


E=kq/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


So what I did was take the q1 and q2 values (given in nC) and convert them to C.
Next I took found the distance from the origin of the two points, solved using the E=kq/r^2 for each point where k=8.99e+9.
I found the components of the E1 (has only j component) and E2 (by solving the angle from the origin using tan^-1(y-distance/x-distance) and multiplying that by the E2 value)
then I added the two vectors together but still do not get the right answer.

I Calculated:
q1 = -2.75e-9 C
q2 = 3.20e-9 C
r1 = .8
r2 = sqrt(1^2 + .4^2) = 1.077
theta = tan^-1(.4/1) = 21.8 deg

I solved the equation
so E1 = -38.6 j (N/C)
and |E2| = 24.8 N/C => separate into components
E2 = 23.03 i + 9.21 j (N/C)

thus Ex = 23.03 N/C
Ey = -15.6 N/C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF,

Basically, the directions of your components are wrong.

In vector form, the electric field of a charge q is $$\mathbf{E} = \frac{kq}{r^2}\mathbf{\hat{r}}$$Boldface quantities represent vectors, and the unit vector ##\mathbf{\hat{r}}## is a unit vector that points "radially outward" (i.e. away from the charge that is the source of the field). The vector ##-\mathbf{\hat{r}}## points towards the charge that is the source of the field. Unlike the Cartesian unit vectors ##\mathbf{\hat{i}}##, ##\mathbf{\hat{j}}##, and ##\mathbf{\hat{k}}##, whose directions are fixed, the direction of ##\mathbf{\hat{r}}## varies depending on where you are in space. In the case where you're located at the origin, and the source of the field, q1, is located on the y-axis at (0,0.8), the radial unit vector, which points away from the source charge and towards the location where you are evaluating the field, is in the ##-\mathbf{\hat{j}}## direction (i.e. ##\mathbf{\hat{r}}## = ##-\mathbf{\hat{j}}## in this particular case). HOWEVER because q1 is negative, this negative sign cancels out the one on the ##\mathbf{\hat{j}}##, and the E-field ends up pointing in the positive ##\mathbf{\hat{j}}## direction. So E1 is directed upwards along the y-axis, towards the charge q1. This make sense, because q1 is negative, so a positive test charge placed at the origin would be attracted up towards it.

Using a similar argument, you can reason that the x and y components of E2 should be in the ##-\mathbf{\hat{i}}## and ##-\mathbf{\hat{j}}## directions respectively (again, because ##\mathbf{\hat{r}}## points away from q2 and towards the origin, and q2 is positive this time).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K