Calculating Electric Flux and Net Force on Charged Particles | Homework Help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric flux and net forces on charged particles. The total electric flux from a cubical box measuring 34.0 cm on each side is given as 1.29 x 10^3 N·m²/C, prompting the question of the enclosed charge using Gauss' Law. Additionally, three charged particles at the corners of an equilateral triangle are analyzed for the net forces acting on them, with specific charges provided. Participants express confusion over calculations and seek clarification on the application of formulas, particularly regarding the constants and dimensions involved. The thread emphasizes the need for clear calculations and proper use of symbols in physics equations.
(?)
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The total electric flux from a cubical box 34.0 cm on a side is 1.29 x 103 N·m2/C. What charge is enclosed by the box?

----and----

Three charged particles are placed at the corners of an equilateral triangle of side d = 1.00 m (Fig. 16-53). The charges are Q1 = +4.0 µC, Q2 = -6.0µC, and Q3 = -6.0 µC. Calculate the magnitude and direction of the net force on each due to the other two.
16-53alt.gif

Figure 16-53
Force on Q1: N at ° counterclockwise from +x axis (to the right)
Force on Q2: N at ° counterclockwise from +x axis (to the right)
Force on Q3: N at ° counterclockwise from +x axis (to the right)

Homework Equations


Gauss' Law (I think)(I don't know how to type those symbols out sooo)

----and----

I'm not really sure on this one. I've tried setting it up F=(k)(d^2/|Q(#)Q(#)) to find the magnitude but that isn't working (or at least my numbers are weird for it)

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to multiply (1.29
multiply.gif
103 N·m2/C)(8.85e-12) but that didn't work? Do I (and if it is needed) how do I incorporate the 34cm?

----and----

See above
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
One question per post please.

Can you show some actual calculation results? "that didn't work" or "that isn't working" doesn't tell us much.

You can find most of the symbols you need by selecting the Sigma icon from the editing menu bar:
Fig1.gif
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top