Calculating Electron Emission from Lithium with 100W Visible Light

  • Thread starter Thread starter silverek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photoelectric
silverek
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The wavelength of visible light is between 400nm and 760nm. We shed a 100W visible light on a piece of metal.

In classical electrodynamics, what is the number of electrons escaping from the Lithium surface per second, if the metal absorbs 20% of the light? Lithium has a work function of 2.38eV.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What minimum wavelength will lead to photoelectron emission (determine this from the work function) ? Now assume that the visible light has a flat frequency distribution and determine the number of sufficiently energetic photons incident on the metal (from the relevant fraction of total power). 20% of this number of photons may be assumed to each produce one photoelectron.
 


The number of electrons escaping from the surface of Lithium per second can be calculated using the formula:

Number of electrons per second = (Power of light * Absorption coefficient * Surface area of metal) / (Planck's constant * Speed of light * Work function)

Substituting the given values, we get:

Number of electrons per second = (100W * 0.2 * Surface area of metal) / (6.626 x 10^-34 J*s * 3 x 10^8 m/s * 2.38 eV)

To determine the surface area of the metal, we need to know the dimensions of the piece of metal. Assuming it is a square with sides of 1 cm, the surface area would be 1 cm^2 or 1 x 10^-4 m^2.

Plugging in the values, we get:

Number of electrons per second = (100W * 0.2 * 1 x 10^-4 m^2) / (6.626 x 10^-34 J*s * 3 x 10^8 m/s * 2.38 eV)

Simplifying, we get:

Number of electrons per second = 5.28 x 10^17 electrons/s

Therefore, if the metal absorbs 20% of the 100W visible light, the number of electrons escaping from the surface of Lithium per second would be approximately 5.28 x 10^17 electrons.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top