MHB Calculating Elevation Angle to Hit Target at 100 m and 10 m

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monoxdifly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the elevation angle needed to hit a target located 100 m away and 10 m high, with an initial velocity of 60 m/s and gravitational acceleration of 10 m/s², the equations of motion for both vertical and horizontal components are used. The time of flight is expressed in terms of the angle of elevation, leading to a quadratic equation in terms of the tangent of the angle. The solutions yield two valid angles for elevation, indicating multiple trajectories can hit the target. The discussion also touches on the derivation of a linear combination identity used in the calculations. The final step involves substituting the known values to find the specific angle of elevation.
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
A target is located at the distance 100 m and height 10 m. How much is the elevation angle of the shooter to be able to hit the target if the initial velocity is 60 m/s and g = $$10m/s^2$$?

What I have done:
100 = 60sin$$\alpha$$t and 10 = 60sin$$\alpha$$t - $$\frac{1}{2}(10)t^2$$
$$t=\frac{5cos\alpha}{3}$$ and $$10=t(60sin\alpha)-t)$$
Dunno what to do from here on.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let's let $\theta$ be the angle of elevation. Let's orient our coordinate axes such that the vertical axis $y$ points up in the positive direction, and the horizontal axis $x$ points in the direction of motion in the positive direction.

For the vertical component of motion, we have:

$$a_y=-g$$

$$v_y=-gt+v_0\sin(\theta)$$

$$y=-\frac{g}{2}t^2+v_0\sin(\theta)t$$

For the horizontal component of motion, we have:

$$a_x=0$$

$$v_x=v_0\cos(\theta)$$

$$x=v_0\cos(\theta)t$$

Let's eliminate the parameter $t$, by using $$t=\frac{x}{v_0\cos(\theta)}$$:

And so:

$$y=-\frac{g}{2}\left(\frac{x}{v_0\cos(\theta)}\right)^2+v_0\sin(\theta)\left(\frac{x}{v_0\cos(\theta)}\right)=-\frac{g}{2v_0^2\cos^2(\theta)}x^2+\tan(\theta)x$$

Multiply through by $\cos^2(\theta)$:

$$y\cos^2(\theta)=-\frac{g}{2v_0^2}x^2+\sin(\theta)\cos(\theta)x$$

Using double-angle identities, and multiplying through by 2, we may write:

$$y\left(\cos(2\theta)+1\right)=-\frac{g}{v_0^2}x^2+\sin(2\theta)x$$

Arrange as:

$$y+\frac{g}{v_0^2}x^2=\sin(2\theta)x-\cos(2\theta)y$$

Using a linear combination identity, we have:

$$\sqrt{x^2+y^2}\sin\left(2\theta-\arctan\left(\frac{y}{x}\right)\right)=y+\frac{g}{v_0^2}x^2$$

Solving for $\theta$, there results:

$$\theta=\frac{1}{2}\left(\arcsin\left(\frac{v_0^2y+gx^2}{v_0^2\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}\right)+\arctan\left(\frac{y}{x}\right)\right)$$

Now, all that's left is to plug in the given values. :)
 
Monoxdifly said:
A target is located at the distance 100 m and height 10 m. How much is the elevation angle of the shooter to be able to hit the target if the initial velocity is 60 m/s and g = $$10m/s^2$$?

$\Delta x = v_0\cos{\theta_0} \cdot t \implies t = \dfrac{\Delta x}{v_0\cos{\theta_0}} = \dfrac{100}{60\cos{\theta}}$

$\Delta y = v_0\sin{\theta_0} \cdot t - \dfrac{1}{2}gt^2 \implies 10 = 60\sin{\theta} \cdot \dfrac{5}{3\cos{\theta}} - 5\left(\dfrac{5}{3\cos{\theta}}\right)^2 \implies 10 = 100\tan{\theta} - \dfrac{125}{9} \sec^2{\theta}$

using the identity $\sec^2{\theta} = 1 + \tan^2{\theta}$ yields a quadratic equation in $\tan{\theta}$ ...

$0 = -43 + 180\tan{\theta} - 25\tan^2{\theta}$

the quadratic formula yields two valid solutions for $\tan{\theta}$ ...

$\tan{\theta} = \dfrac{18 \pm \sqrt{281}}{5}$
 
Yes, there should be two solutions, and in my post above, I should have included:

$$\sqrt{x^2+y^2}\sin\left(\pi-\left(2\theta-\arctan\left(\frac{y}{x}\right)\right)\right)=y+\frac{g}{v_0^2}x^2$$

As a means of getting the other. :)
 
MarkFL said:
Let's let $\theta$ be the angle of elevation. Let's orient our coordinate axes such that the vertical axis $y$ points up in the positive direction, and the horizontal axis $x$ points in the direction of motion in the positive direction.

For the vertical component of motion, we have:

$$a_y=-g$$

$$v_y=-gt+v_0\sin(\theta)$$

$$y=-\frac{g}{2}t^2+v_0\sin(\theta)t$$

For the horizontal component of motion, we have:

$$a_x=0$$

$$v_x=v_0\cos(\theta)$$

$$x=v_0\cos(\theta)t$$

Let's eliminate the parameter $t$, by using $$t=\frac{x}{v_0\cos(\theta)}$$:

And so:

$$y=-\frac{g}{2}\left(\frac{x}{v_0\cos(\theta)}\right)^2+v_0\sin(\theta)\left(\frac{x}{v_0\cos(\theta)}\right)=-\frac{g}{2v_0^2\cos^2(\theta)}x^2+\tan(\theta)x$$

Multiply through by $\cos^2(\theta)$:

$$y\cos^2(\theta)=-\frac{g}{2v_0^2}x^2+\sin(\theta)\cos(\theta)x$$

Using double-angle identities, and multiplying through by 2, we may write:

$$y\left(\cos(2\theta)+1\right)=-\frac{g}{v_0^2}x^2+\sin(2\theta)x$$

Arrange as:

$$y+\frac{g}{v_0^2}x^2=\sin(2\theta)x-\cos(2\theta)y$$

Using a linear combination identity, we have:

$$\sqrt{x^2+y^2}\sin\left(2\theta-\arctan\left(\frac{y}{x}\right)\right)=y+\frac{g}{v_0^2}x^2$$

Solving for $\theta$, there results:

$$\theta=\frac{1}{2}\left(\arcsin\left(\frac{v_0^2y+gx^2}{v_0^2\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}\right)+\arctan\left(\frac{y}{x}\right)\right)$$

Now, all that's left is to plug in the given values. :)

Thank you! All comprehensible except the linear combination identity part. What's that and how was it derived?
 
Monoxdifly said:
Thank you! All comprehensible except the linear combination identity part. What's that and how was it derived?

Here's a link that describes the derivation of the identity:

Linear Combination of Sine and Cosine
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top